BEFORE THE MURDERS, THERE WAS ANOTHER WOMAN, ANOTHER REPORT AND A CASE THAT NEVER REACHED PROSECUTORS

The story of Wade Wilson’s rise to national notoriety did not begin with the two Cape Coral murders. It began months earlier with an allegation made by a woman who said she had survived a violent encounter with him. That earlier report is now receiving renewed attention after Netflix’s “Worst Ex Ever” revisited the case and highlighted the investigation conducted by the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office. Kelly Matthews reported Wilson in February 2019 after an encounter she described as violent and terrifying. She told investigators that she had been beaten, threatened and Sєxually ᴀssaulted. She also described injuries that investigators documented. Detective Louis Potter interviewed Matthews and later questioned Wilson. A DNA sample was collected from Wilson as part of the investigation. But the case did not proceed to an arrest. According to records later examined in subsequent reporting, Potter closed the investigation 34 days after it began, before the laboratory had completed its DNA analysis.

The internal investigation that followed years later concluded that Potter had not carried out a sufficiently thorough Sєx-crimes investigation. Investigators also found that he failed to follow up after the DNA results were returned. The internal review said evidence from the incident, including physical injuries and material from the vehicle connected to the allegations, supported Matthews’ account and should have received further consideration. Potter’s original ᴀssessment was different. His report stated that there were no witnesses, no evidence establishing probable cause and that Wilson denied the accusations. The conflicting ᴀssessments have remained central to the controversy because they demonstrate how differently the same investigative file was interpreted at different stages. The case also raises an important distinction between an internal disciplinary review and a criminal prosecution. An internal investigation examines whether an officer followed departmental policies and procedures. A criminal prosecution requires prosecutors to establish that legally sufficient evidence exists to bring and prove a charge. In this case, the Palm Beach County internal review determined that Potter’s handling violated agency procedures. He was suspended for 120 hours without pay and reᴀssigned to road patrol operations. He later retired on July 31, 2026.

Former State Attorney Dave Aronberg has said the matter never reached his office during the original investigation. He also cautioned against judging the decisions entirely through the knowledge that became available later. That caution is particularly relevant because Wilson’s subsequent crimes dramatically changed how the earlier file was perceived. On Oct. 7, 2019, Wilson killed Kristine Melton and Diane Ruiz in Lee County. The murders became the foundation of a major criminal prosecution. At trial, prosecutors presented evidence detailing how Wilson encountered Melton in Fort Myers and Ruiz later that same day. The jury convicted him in 2024, and he was sentenced to death. His case has continued through the appellate system.

The Florida Supreme Court heard arguments concerning his death sentences in February 2026, and his attorneys have also pursued federal review. Meanwhile, the Netflix documentary has introduced the Palm Beach investigation to an international audience. The show’s appeal lies partly in the unusual structure of the story: viewers know the ending before watching the beginning. They know that the man being questioned in the earlier investigation would later become a convicted double murderer. Investigators in February 2019 did not have that information. That difference creates a difficult question about accountability, evidence and hindsight. The documentary has also shifted attention toward the experience of Matthews, whose report became the earliest major warning sign now ᴀssociated with the case. Her story is not simply a footnote to Wilson’s murders. It is an independent account of an alleged ᴀssault and an investigation that was later criticized by the agency itself. The renewed attention therefore reaches beyond the idenтιтy of the man ultimately convicted. It concerns the decisions made by insтιтutions when a survivor reports violence, the handling of forensic evidence and the safeguards designed to prevent cases from being prematurely closed. Those issues remain relevant long after the cameras stop recording and the documentary ends.

Source: https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/crime/2026/08/12/netflix-show-details-ᴅᴇᴀᴅpool-killer-failures-in-palm-beach-county/91147812007/