The trial of Karmelo Anthony continued with jurors reviewing video evidence from a Frisco compeтιтion event, according to courtroom accounts.

The footage, which was presented as part of the prosecution’s evidence, is reported to show moments surrounding the incident central to the case. It was introduced during proceedings in court rather than being publicly broadcast, consistent with standard legal practice in many trials involving evidentiary materials.

Both the prosecution and defense have used the video as part of their arguments, offering different interpretations of what the footage shows and its relevance to intent and sequence of events.

Legal analysts note that video evidence often plays a significant role in helping juries ᴀssess timelines and actions, but must still be weighed alongside witness testimony and other materials presented during the trial.

At this stage, the court has not issued any final ruling based on the footage alone, and the case remains ongoing as arguments continue.