A woman who was arrested for ‘filming jurors’ outside of Lindsay Clancy‘s murder trial was mobbed by reporters and furious supporters on Wednesday morning.
On Tuesday afternoon, Dawn Light, 56, was arrested outside of Plymouth Superior Court for allegedly recording jurors on her phone as they exited the courthouse.
At her arraignment hearing in the same building on Wednesday, Light was formally charged with aggravated intimidation, and prosecutors asked for a $50,000 cash bail.
The Mᴀssachusetts woman was engulfed by a media frenzy as well as angry Clancy supporters on her way out of the courthouse, with one person shouting: ‘Congratulations, you are a celebrity now.’
Later in the morning, a different woman fainted inside the courthouse corridors, but appeared to be ok after officers rushed to her side.
The jury in Clancy’s murder trial will enter its fifth day of deliberations today after returning ᴅᴇᴀᴅlocked on Tuesday.
The nine women and three men were unable to reach a unanimous decision before Judge William Sullivan ordered them to continue to weigh up evidence yesterday.
Clancy is on trial for killing her three children Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months, using exercise bands at her Duxbury, Mᴀssachusetts, home in January 2023. She has admitted to the slayings but pleaded not guilty to murder.
Follow the Daily Mail for more updates…
Dawn Light swarmed by media after intimidation arraignment hearing
Dawn Light, 56, was swarmed by the media as she left the courthouse on Wednesday.
She was very defensive, claiming she wanted to see Clancy and wasn’t filming the jury.
However, at the arraignment hearing, prosecutors claimed that police found a video of the juror in the deleted folder on Light’s phone.
When asked why she was filming, she said, ‘I wasn’t.’ Then she said, ‘I just wanted to see Lindsay.’
At one point she said, ‘Leave me alone.’
Light, who described herself as a ‘true crime junkie,’ has insisted she was not trying to intimidate anyone, but only wanted to film Clancy as she left the courthouse.

WATCH: How the Lindsay Clancy trial unfolded as jury deliberates murder
Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney described her as a ‘damn good mother’ who did ‘nothing wrong’ before she strangled her children to death during emotional closing arguments.
Reddington vehemently defended his client throughout the trial, but further emphasized his belief during his closing statement.
Patrick Clancy’s lawyer puts influencers and celebrities peddling conspiracies about his children’s killings ‘on notice’
Since the start of her trial on July 27, social media users and celebrities have shared unfounded theories about the case online, including that Patrick allegedly had something to do with the tragedy that has shocked America.
Patrick has never spoken out about the baseless rumors, but as Lindsay’s case comes to a close, his attorney has threatened those sharing the ‘false, defamatory statements.’
Explore more
Patrick Clancy’s lawyer puts influencers and celebrities ‘on notice’
Patrick Clancy’s lawyer said that influencers and celebrities who have shared baseless conspiracies about his client online have been put ‘on notice.’
WATCH: Prosecution’s closing arguments
ADA Jennifer Sprague presented the closing argument and asked the jury to find Clancy guilty of murder on Thursday.
‘She knew what she did was wrong. She could conform her behavior to the law and chose not to,’ Sprague said.
‘She didn’t expect to have any consequences because she expected to die with her children.
‘You know it was deliberate premeditation because of the way she killed them and the way they died.’
Sprague continued: ‘She didn’t see them in that moment as individual human beings with rights, with dreams, with futures.
‘She didn’t bring them up to their beds; she left them, discarded on the basement floor, like broken toys, like she was done playing the game. You know, to a moral certainty, she is guilty.’
One member of the jury appeared to wipe away tears during the closing argument.
Lindsay Clancy verdict ‘disaster’: Legal experts predict nightmare ending no one saw coming
The jury’s admission they cannot reach a unanimous raises the specter of a hung jury, according to legal experts who spoke with the Daily Mail.
It raises the horrific prospect of this trial being played out all over again – and a prosecution once again brought that, according to many, should never have been brought in the first place.
‘Just a disaster if it’s a hung jury,’ criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Mark Bederow told the Daily Mail.
Explore more
Lindsay Clancy verdict predicted: Experts warn of ‘disaster’ ending
The Lindsay Clancy trial is on the brink of ‘disaster’ after 18 hours of deliberation, jurors remained hopelessly ᴅᴇᴀᴅlocked as of Tuesday morning.
<ʙuттon class="ʙuттon_1dKS5whc outlined_21VU3G0A shareʙuттon_3e32AiQU" type="ʙuттon">

Shareʙuттon>
Woman faints trying to get into Lindsay Clancy courtroom
A woman fainted in the corridor outside the Lindsay Clancy courtroom.
Court officers then came rushing out of the courtroom to see her.
She seemed to quickly recover and was chatting with the officers.
The woman was then taken out on a gurney by medics.
Who is on the Lindsay Clancy jury?
A panel of 12 jurors are deliberating in a private room on whether they find Lindsay Clancy guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter.
The jury includes nine women and three men. The foreperson is a woman. They have not been sequestered for deliberations.
As of Wednesday morning, the group has deliberated for 23 hours without reaching a verdict.
<ʙuттon class="ʙuттon_1dKS5whc outlined_21VU3G0A shareʙuттon_3e32AiQU" type="ʙuттon">

Shareʙuттon>
Why Patrick Clancy can’t face Lindsay
With jury in verdict ᴅᴇᴀᴅlock, those closest to grieving dad reveal distressing crisis hundreds of miles away from court as he retreats to ‘bunker.’
Explore more
Why Patrick Clancy can’t face Lindsay as jury reach ᴅᴇᴀᴅlock
The panel of nine women and three men were sent home Tuesday after failing to reach a verdict on the fourth day of deliberations and will resume on Wednesday morning.
<ʙuттon class="ʙuттon_1dKS5whc outlined_21VU3G0A shareʙuттon_3e32AiQU" type="ʙuттon">

Shareʙuттon>
Woman arrested at Lindsay Clancy trial is arraigned
56-year-old Dawn Light was arraigned in court on Wednesday for ‘filming jurors’ outside of court in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial.
She has been charged with intimidation of a witness, jurors or person furnishing information in connection with criminal proceedings.
<ʙuттon class="ʙuттon_1dKS5whc outlined_21VU3G0A shareʙuттon_3e32AiQU" type="ʙuттon">

Shareʙuттon>
Revealed: The ‘true crime junkie’ arrested at Lindsay Clancy trial for jury intimidation as prosecutors detail the deleted videos they found on her phone
The woman arrested for intimidation outside the Lindsay Clancy courthouse claimed she was trying to film the killer mom as she left.
Dawn Light, 56, of Sutton, was taken into custody outside Plymouth District Court at 3.40pm on Tuesday and charged with intimidation of a witness, jurors or person furnishing information in connection with criminal proceedings, according to Mᴀssachusetts State Police.
She has now appeared in that same courthouse for her own arraignment hearing on Wednesday as the jury continues to deliberate Clancy’s fate.
Explore more
Revealed: The ‘true crime junkie’ arrested at Lindsay Clancy trial
Dawn Light, 56, was arrested outside the Lindsay Clancy courthouse and charged with intimidation.
<ʙuттon class="ʙuттon_1dKS5whc outlined_21VU3G0A shareʙuттon_3e32AiQU" type="ʙuттon">

Shareʙuттon>
What sentence is Lindsay Clancy facing?
Lindsay Clancy is on trial for the murders of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at her home in Duxbury in January 2023.
She does not deny she killed them, but has pleaded not guilty and claimed she is not responsible for her actions because she was suffering postpartum psychosis after being prescribed a powerful cocktail of drugs to cope with depression.
The prosecution has argued the killings were intentional and well planned, not the work of someone who had lost control.
Jurors are now deciding if she is guilty of murder, manslaughter or not guilty due to a lack of criminal responsibility.
If convicted of murder, she faces life in prison without parole.
If the jury finds her guilty of manslaughter, she faces a maximum sentence of 20 years behind bars.
If found not guilty due to a lack of criminal responsibility, she would be committed to a state mental health facility.
SOURCE: https://www.dailymail.com/crime-desk/article-16099015/lindsay-clancy-case-jury-trial-verdict-husband-kids-live-updates.html