TESCO CAR PARK HORROR SHOCKS THE NATION đđĄ â Chaos Caught on Camera!

Driver, 95, who killed dog walker while eyeing up empty disabled space is spared jail

A 95-year-old woman who ran over a dogwalker because she was too busy eyeing up a free disabled space on a petrol station forecourt has been spared jail.
Joan Barwick was âsimply not looking at what was in front of herâ when she drove into grandmother Linda Wareham, 77, in Oldswinford in the West Midlands on April 17 last year.
Wolverhampton Crown Court heard Barwick, of Wollescote, Dudley, was turning right into a petrol station forecourt in Hagley Road while Mrs Wareham was crossing but failed to stop to let her cross.
Barwick, wearing a purple cardigan and using a walking stick to enter the courtroom for her sentencing hearing on Friday, was given a 16-month prison sentence, suspended for two years.
She had previously pleaded guilty to causing death by dangerous driving.
The elderly defendant was allowed to sit in the well of the court instead of in the dock so she could hear proceedings properly.
The court heard Barwick, who was driving a red Vauxhall Corsa, would have had seven seconds to see Mrs Wareham before the collision occurred, but was focused on a disabled parking space that she had spotted was free.

Mrs Wareham suffered catastrophic head injuries, and her life support was turned off at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham the next day.
The victimâs tearful husband and daughter left the courtroom as CCTV footage of the moment she was hit by Barwickâs car was played.
Prosecution counsel Tim Harrington said Barwick was ânot paying proper attention to what was in front of herâ.
He said: âShe was driving at an appropriate speed and had slowed down to 10mph but that should have meant she would see any pedestrian crossing her path, so Mrs Barwick was simply not looking at what was in front of her.
âInstead, she was looking towards an available parking space on (the) forecourt.
âAs she drove slowly into the garage, she didnât see Mrs Wareham, who was walking quite normally with her dog.
âShe was driving at such a speed that she would have been able to stop had she seen her, perhaps making this all the more tragic.â
Mr Harrington said Barwick, who was 94 at the time of the collision, had an âunblemishedâ driving record but said Mrs Wareham was a vulnerable road user who had right of way.
Defending, Paul Lewis said Barwick had âgenuine remorseâ for what had happened and had surrendered her driving licence following the fatal collision.
He urged Judge Michael Chambers KC to suspend any custodial sentence, saying imprisonment would reduce her life expectancy to months.
He said: âHer remorse is genuine and is sincere. She admitted her wrongdoing at the earliest opportunity.
âShe does not in any way seek to excuse what took place.
âShe continues to suffer the consequences of what she has done.â

He added: âMrs Barwick accepts she was not paying proper attention⌠There are clearly no winners here.
âIt is a terribly tragic set of circumstances.â
In a victim impact statement, Mrs Warehamâs husband Peter said the couple had met at the age of 15 and had shared 60 years of life together but he had now been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.
He said: âShe was caring and selfless⌠She was good fun and independent.
âShe enjoyed a life of good health.
âAll that ended on April 18 when my wife was cruelly taken.â
Mrs Warehamâs daughter Joanne Willetts said her mother was her âunfaltering constantâ.
She said: âI cannot accept she isnât coming back.
âI carry a quiet sadness that will be with me the rest of my life.
âTo lose my mum so tragically is heartbreaking for me and my children.â
Sentencing, Judge Chambers said: âMrs Wareham was clear for everyone to see as she progressed along the pavement.
âIâm quite satisfied Mrs Wareham is entirely blameless.
âShe was enŃΚŃled to expect you to stop and respect the fact she had right of way on the pavement.â
He added: âNothing I say in imposing sentence can put the clock back nor should any sentence I impose be seen as an attempt to put value on a life that has been lost.
âThe Crownâs case is put on the basis that this was a momentary failure to keep a proper lookout.
âThe Crown accepts that it can be inferred you were not paying proper attention as you should have done.
âYou were simply not looking at what was in front of you, instead looking at an available parking space.â
He added: âIt is right that you have no previous convictions and no previous offences related to driving matters. You have a good driving record.
âThe Crown accepts that in January prior to this offence, you reapplied for your licence, and it was accepted that your sight was satisfactory to continue driving.â
Suspending the sentence he imposed, Judge Chambers said a period in custody would have a âsignificant impactâ on Barwick.
He also disqualified her from driving for 10 years and ordered she pay ÂŁ705 of prosecution costs.