LINDSAY Clancy’s “widely divergent” accounts of the night she killed her three children were called into question on Tuesday as a prosecution witness picked apart differences in her story.

Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff highlighted conflicting details about when Clancy allegedly began hearing a male voice, what she was doing when it started and what the voice told her to do.

Defendant Lindsay Clancy talks with her lawyer Kevin Reddington during her murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court, Monday, August 24, 2026

Judge William Sullivan sent jurors home after Dr. Heilbrun’s testimony that referenced Clancy’s Catholic faith and beliefs about sᩚuᩚiᩚcide on August 24, 2026

Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague after making her argument against a mistrial at the Plymouth Superior Court trial of Lindsay Clancy on August 24, 2026

Patrick Clancy with his children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month old Callan
The prosecution’s final reʙuттal witness told jurors at Plymouth Superior Court that the inconsistencies raised concerns about the reliability of Clancy’s recollection.

Clancy told Saathoff she was getting nuggets from the refrigerator for her children when she heard a voice tell her, “This is your last chance, you have to kill your kids and kill yourself.”

But Patrick Clancy told the psychiatrist that their son Dawson was already eating chicken nuggets on the couch before he left the house that night.

Saathoff also said Clancy gave differing accounts of when the alleged voice began, including another version in which it started after Patrick had already left.

“In this case the widely divergent reports … raise questions about what she is telling me and how things are happening,” Saathoff testified.

He also questioned why the alleged voice appeared for the first time that night, remained constant through the killings and then abruptly stopped after Clancy strangled her youngest child, Callan.

Saathoff said Clancy had not previously reported hearing voices to the medical professionals treating her.

The psychiatrist also examined Clancy’s behavior after the killings, including complaints she later made about her treatment while recovering at Spaulding Rehab.

Clancy told him she became upset when hospital staff prevented her from discussing the deaths with a visiting longtime friend, leaving them instead to engage in “gossip” and catch up.

She said the conversation felt “superficial” and worried it could give others a false impression about her mєntal state.

Saathoff’s testimony came as prosecutors moved closer to wrapping up their reʙuттal case after five weeks of evidence over whether Clancy was criminally responsible for the deaths.

Judge William Sullivan told jurors that the evidence is expected to close on Wednesday, with closing arguments now likely Thursday.

Graphic warning: Lindsay Clancy’s trial involves disturbing details in its discussion of sᩚuᩚiᩚcide, postpartum psychosis, and murder. Please scroll with discretion.

This live blog has now ended. Scroll below to catch up on all the updates from the Lindsay Clancy murder trial and read our latest coverage of the case...

See more on the Lindsay Clancy trial

Follow The U.S. Sun’s YouTube account for our expert analysis on the trial dividing America including:

Our exclusive interview with Lindsay Clancy’s defense lawyer Kevin Reddington, on the mistrial bid, her state of mind and what comes next in the trial,
The wild conspiracy theories surrounding Patrick Clancy that have exploded online during Lindsay’s murder trial,
Inside the prosecution and defense tactics shaping Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial as both sides battle over whether she was criminally responsible.

Body language analysis on the first time Lindsay saw Patrick at trial,
How Lindsay’s tattooed black-belt lawyer once hurled THROWING STARS in court,
The original ‘Mindhunter’ reveals why she believes Lindsay should never be released,
Our exclusive interview with the woman behind the silent rally supporting Lindsay Clancy.

Closing arguments likely Thursday as testimony nears end

Jurors were sent home on Tuesday after prosecution witness Dr Gregory Saathoff stepped down from the stand, with Judge William Sullivan saying the evidence is expected to wrap up the next day.

“It is anticipated that the evidence will close tomorrow,” Sullivan told the jury.

But the judge warned that closing arguments will likely have to wait while the court and lawyers sort out final trial matters.

“It’s probable that we will be doing closing arguments not tomorrow, but the day after,” Sullivan said.

Prosecution witness points to takeout and sᩚuᩚiᩚcide attempts as ‘sequential’ choices

Saathoff told jurors that Lindsay Clancy’s actions before and after the killings involved a series of separate decisions.

He said Clancy told him 3V was the only takeout restaurant that came to mind that night, while Patrick said the family had never ordered from there and usually used several places closer to their Duxbury home.

Saathoff also testified that Clancy had researched medicine for one of the children online nearly an hour before Patrick later left to pick it up at CVS.

Turning to her sᩚuᩚiᩚcide attempt, Saathoff said his review suggested it involved “sequential decision making.”

He said Clancy described retrieving a knife, going upstairs, cutting herself and taking an overdose of medication before jumping from the window.

Saathoff noted that Clancy did not describe taking “handfuls” of pills or give him a specific amount.

He also told jurors she had previously contacted a sᩚuᩚiᩚcide H๏τline twice and went to the emergency room in December 2022 amid concerns about self-harm and suicidal thoughts.

Clancy complained hospital talks felt ‘superficial’

Dr. Saathoff told jurors Lindsay Clancy said she became upset when staff at Spaulding Rehab restricted what she could discuss with a visiting friend.

Clancy said the conversation was reduced to “gossip” and catching up because she was not allowed to talk about the killings.

Saathoff testified that Clancy worried the exchange could give people a misleading picture of how she was really doing mentally.

He also said Clancy felt Spaulding staff were concentrating more on her spinal injuries than her psychiatric condition, though Saathoff noted records showed she was seen by mєntal health providers there.

Psychiatrist details earlier medication history

Saathoff also told jurors that Clancy had taken Prozac, Wellbutrin and Propranolol in 2013 while she was dating Patrick.

He said Patrick told him he had been unaware until late 2022 that Clancy had previously taken anti-anxiety medication.

Saathoff testified that Lamictal, a mood stabilizer, was later discussed as a possible treatment option in December 2022.

He said Clancy decided against taking it because she was worried about the risk of a rash.

Saathoff added that he did not see evidence her provider, Dr Jennifer Tufts, had been told about that decision, which he said could have allowed doctors to consider another treatment option.

Prosecution witness flags ‘widely divergent’ accounts from Clancy

Dr. Saathoff told jurors that differences in Lindsay Clancy’s accounts raised concerns about how reliable her recollection was.

He pointed to Clancy saying she was getting chicken nuggets from the refrigerator when the alleged voice began, while Patrick Clancy said Dawson was already eating chicken nuggets before he left the house.

Saathoff also noted that Clancy had given different accounts about exactly when the voice started, including one version in which it began after Patrick left.

“In this case the widely divergent reports … raise questions about what she is telling me and how things are happening,” Saathoff testified.

He also said Clancy’s fear that discussing her mєntal health could lead to her children being taken away was a rational concern rather than an irrational belief.

Prosecution witness questions timing of Clancy’s alleged voice

Prosecution psychiatrist Dr. Saathoff told jurors he found the timing of Lindsay Clancy’s reported command hallucination usual.

Saathoff said Clancy told him an external male voice began immediately after a phone call with Patrick, repeatedly saying, “This is your last chance, you have to kill your kids and kill yourself.”

He said Clancy described the voice as constant until she finished strangling her youngest child, Callan, and then said it suddenly stopped.

Saathoff noted that Clancy had not previously reported hearing voices to the professionals treating her before the killings.

He also highlighted differences in how she later described the voice, including accounts that it grew more intense and warned that her children would suffer if she did not obey.

“That was unusual,” Saathoff testified, adding that he also found it striking that the voice allegedly stopped before Clancy went upstairs and attempted to take her own life.

When prosecutor Jennifer Sprague pressed him on why that mattered, defense attorney Kevin Reddington objected and Judge William Sullivan called the lawyers to a sidebar.

Who is the reporter Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer branded a ‘weasel?’

Kevin Reddington, Lindsay Clancy’s attorney, confronted a controversial ex-radio host outside the courtroom as he was making his way inside for what is expected to be the final day of testimony.

The U.S. Sun’s reporter Katy Forrester was outside Plymouth Superior Court when the fiery exchange went down.

Surrounded by a sea of reporters, Reddington noticed John DePetro in the crowd and confront him, saying, “You.”

“Let me tell you something, I don’t want to talk to you again,” Reddington told DePetro.

“You are a biased weasel. Okay? You are. Stay away from me. Stay away from me.”

Reddington approached DePetro about comments he made about witness prosecutors called.

DePetro, who dubs himself “The Independent Man,” is the host of The John DePetro Radio Show, which airs weekdays in Mᴀssachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.

He frequently provides independent trial reporting, including live courtroom commentary for high-profile cases like the Karen Read trial.

Clancy described ‘last chance’ voice before killing

Prosecution psychiatrist Dr. Saathoff told jurors Clancy
described hearing an outside voice while preparing dinner for her children on the night they died.

Saathoff said Clancy told him she was standing by the refrigerator when she took a phone call from her then-husband Patrick.

She said that immediately after the call ended, a voice told her it was her “last chance” and ordered her to kill herself and the children

Saathoff said Clancy gave another provider an additional detail, reporting that the voice warned her the children would suffer if she refused to obey it.

He also said Clancy was “very pleasant” and responsive during the roughly 11 hours he spent interviewing her by Zoom.

Prosecution witness Dr. Saathoff interviewed Lindsay Clancy

Dr. Saathoff told jurors he reviewed an extensive collection of material before reaching his conclusions about Lindsay Clancy

That included medical records, police reports, grand jury material, expert reports from both sides and video footage, including interviews and clips of the Clancy family at a museum.

“The amount of information” available in the case was “truly significant,” Saathoff testified.

He said he also interviewed Clancy twice by Zoom in May and June for a combined total of about 11 hours.

Saathoff said he could not travel to meet her in person at the time “for personal reasons.”

Earlier, he told jurors that psychosis can occur in conditions including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder.

Prosecution witness explains how psychosis can appear

Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff told jurors psychosis can show itself in several different ways.

He said people may hear voices or sounds, see things that are not there, or experience hallucinations involving touch or smell.

Psychosis can also involve delusions, Saathoff testified, as well as confused communication or speech that becomes disconnected.

Patrick Clancy’s lawyer rips wild conspiracy theories

Since taking the stand at his ex-wife high-profile trial during the first week, Patrick Clancy has not spoken out in public about his testimony or about the wild conspiracies circulating on social media.

Since his testimony, social media users alleged Patrick had some sort of role in the events that unfolded on January 24, 2023.

One TikToker alleged, without providing any evidence, “I do not believe that Lindsay Clancy committed these crimes. I fully believe that Patrick convinced her that she did.”

Attorney Howard Cooper, who represents Patrick, said those kind of statements are false and defamatory when approached by CNN.

“The facts are indisputable: Patrick Clancy has suffered an unspeakable and unimaginable loss.,” Cooper told the outlet.

“Unfortunately, the tᩚraɢedy Patrick has experienced has been compounded by patently false, defamatory, and injurious public statements.

“The individuals making those statements – from minor influencers to major celebrities – should be on notice that their despicable actions and false, defamatory statements have caused real life consequences to the health and safety of Patrick and his family.”
Patrick Clancy, glances over at the defense table where his ex-wife, Lindsay Clancy, who is accused of killing her children, is seated during week-one of her murder trial

13 hours ago

Prosecution witness says he has treated mothers who killed their children

Prosecution witness Dr. Saathoff told jurors he has treated several women who killed their children during his career.

“I would say five to seven women who had killed their children,” he testified.

Saathff said part of that work involved helping the women talk through what they had experienced and how they coped beyond the medication they were receiving.

The prosecution calls its final witness

The prosecution has now called its final witness, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff.

Dr. Saathoff is a senior psychiatrist for the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit in Quantico.