A Bungee Cord, a Black Closet, and a Judge Who Sent Them Home the Next Day

On the afternoon of July 20, 2026, a caller told the St. Mary’s County Sheriff’s Office that a child was being held in a closet at a house in the 20000 block of Roh Ranch Lane in Callaway, Maryland. Deputies went. At the end of a hallway they found a closet door held shut with a bungee cord tied to a bed. They cut or removed the cord. Inside, they later alleged, was a four-year-old boy, naked, lying on debris and trash. The closet walls were painted black. A light inside did not appear to work. A television was mounted on the wall. Food wrappers, dirty diapers, feces, and other refuse covered so much of the floor that, investigators said, the floor itself could not be seen. The boy was taken for a medical evaluation. Four other children in the house did not need one. Three adults lived there, including, according to the mother, her grandfather.

The mother, Kaylynn Nicole Moore, 28, told deputies the child was left in the closet daily for about twelve hours. Her boyfriend, James Earl Stone, 27, admitted using the bungee cord because, she said, the doorknob did not secure properly. Moore described the residence itself as “so hazardous,” with rat or mouse feces and roaches through the home. Both were charged that day: Moore with one felony count of second-degree child abuse as a custodian and seven misdemeanor counts of neglect of a minor; Stone with second-degree child abuse as a household member and the same seven neglect counts. The neglect counts reach the conditions affecting more than one child, and they include separate accusations about the confinement of the four-year-old. They were taken to the detention center in Leonardtown. A court commissioner ordered them held without bond.

The next day, at bond review, Judge Karen Friedman released both of them on their own recognizance. They walked out of the St. Mary’s County Detention and Rehabilitation Center while the felony child-abuse counts, and the seven neglect counts each, stayed on the file. Moore had waived an attorney for the initial appearance only. Both were later listed as eligible for the public defender. Moore’s preliminary hearing was set for August 10, 2026, at 1 p.m. The charging documents were not all public on the afternoon after the arrest, which is why the first wire copy was thinner than the affidavits that followed. The affidavits are where the black paint, the ᴅᴇᴀᴅ light, the mounted television, and the twelve-hour daily claim live. Those details are allegations. They are also the details a judge had in front of her, or available to her, when she decided that neither adult needed to sleep in jail while the case moved.

Own-recognizance release is not an acquittal, and it is not a finding that the closet did not happen. It is a finding that the court believed these two defendants would come back, and that holding them was not necessary to protect the public or the process, under whatever standard Judge Friedman applied on July 21. In a case built on a caller, a bungee cord, and a naked preschooler on a trash floor, that decision is the fact that traveled farther than the arrest. Neighbors and readers do not parse the difference between a no-bond hold and a recognizance release as a technical bail question. They read it as an answer to a simpler one: after what deputies say they opened, did the adults go home? On this docket, they did, one day later.

The twelve-hour claim, if a jury ever hears it from Moore’s own mouth as deputies wrote it down, is the line that separates a terrible house from a daily practice. A doorknob that does not latch is a hardware problem. A bungee cord tied to a bed, used every day so that a four-year-old stays in a black closet without a working light, with a television mounted inside and a floor of diapers and feces, is the state’s theory of abuse by a custodian and by a household member. Stone’s admission, as reported from the sheriff’s account, goes to the cord. Moore’s statement goes to the schedule. The grandfather in the house is not, in the public charging, a defendant. The other four children are the reason the neglect counts are seven rather than one. Southern Maryland News Net and The BayNet both reported the recognizance release and the core admissions. The Enterprise carried the sheriff’s press language: horrible condition, no light, no food, twelve hours, bungee cord.

A preliminary hearing in August would have been the first time a judge, other than the bond judge, had to decide whether those allegations were enough to hold the felonies for circuit court. Between July 21 and that date, Moore and Stone were free on their promise to appear, living with the same charges, and the four-year-old was not in that closet. Child-welfare placement in a case like this usually moves faster than the criminal docket, and the public record available in the first forty-eight hours did not spell out where each child slept on the night of July 21. What it did spell out is the sequence that made the story travel: a caller, a cord, a child, a confession about twelve hours a day, a no-bond hold, and a judge who undid the hold before the next sunset. The felony is still a felony. The closet is still in the affidavit. The adults, as of that Tuesday morning, were not in jail.