According to court records, the defendant admitted to placing the dog into a body of water and leaving it there. She reportedly told investigators that she believed the animal was suffering from a serious illness and claimed she acted out of what she described as “mercy.”

However, veterinary findings presented during the case did not support claims that the dog was terminally ill, according to evidence reviewed in court. Prosecutors argued that the actions taken were deliberate and resulted in the animal’s death.

The court heard arguments from both the prosecution and defense before delivering its final sentencing decision. The judge considered the circumstances of the case, including intent, harm caused, and the defendant’s statements.

The case has drawn strong reactions from the public and animal welfare groups, with many calling for stricter penalties in cases of animal abuse.

Authorities have reminded the public that concerns about an animal’s health should always be addressed through licensed veterinary professionals.