Related Movies:

Vengeance: A Love Story (2017), directed by Johnny Martin and starring Nicolas Cage, is a gritty action thriller that dives into the murky waters of retribution and redemption. Based on Joyce Carol Oates’ 2003 novella Rape: A Love Story, the film follows a grieving mother and a vigilante cop seeking justice after a brutal ᴀssault in a small, crime-ridden town. With strong performances from Cage and Anna Hutchison, stark visuals, and a raw exploration of trauma, the film delivers moments of emotional intensity but struggles with a predictable script and pacing issues. This review examines why Vengeance: A Love Story is a compelling, if flawed, entry in the vigilante thriller genre.

Plot Summary: A Brutal Quest for Justice

Set in Niagara Falls, New York, Vengeance: A Love Story centers on Teena Maguire (Anna Hutchison), a single mother brutally ᴀssaulted by a gang of thugs on the Fourth of July. Her young daughter, Bethie (Talitha Bateman), witnesses the attack, sparking a chain of events that draws in John Dromoor (Nicolas Cage), a Gulf War veteran and police detective with a troubled past. As the legal system, tainted by a corrupt defense attorney (Don Johnson), fails Teena, John takes matters into his own hands, waging a one-man war against the perpetrators.

The narrative explores themes of justice, trauma, and moral ambiguity, with Teena and John forming an unlikely bond in their shared quest for retribution. While the premise promises a gripping exploration of vigilante justice, the script, adapted by John Mankiewicz, leans heavily on genre clichés, resulting in a predictable arc that lacks the nuance of Oates’ novella. Nevertheless, the film’s emotional core and intense confrontations keep viewers engaged.

Cinematography and Atmosphere: A Stark, Gritty World

Director Johnny Martin, a former stunt coordinator, brings a visceral edge to Vengeance: A Love Story through stark cinematography by David Stragmeister. The film’s Niagara Falls setting—grimy motels, desolate streets, and misty waterfronts—creates a bleak, noir-like atmosphere that mirrors the characters’ despair. тιԍнт close-ups during courtroom scenes and brutal fight sequences amplify the tension, while muted colors underscore the story’s grim tone.

The action sequences, though sparse, are raw and effective, with Cage’s physicality shining in gritty brawls. The film’s low-budget constraints are occasionally evident in uneven editing and simplistic staging, but the authentic locations, including real Niagara Falls landmarks, ground the story in a tangible sense of place. A understated score by Frederik Wiedmann complements the mood, though it lacks the memorability of standout thriller soundtracks.

Performances: Cage and Hutchison Anchor the Film

Nicolas Cage delivers a brooding, restrained performance as John Dromoor, a far cry from his more eccentric roles. His portrayal of a haunted, duty-driven cop is understated yet powerful, conveying pain and resolve through subtle expressions and physicality. Cage’s chemistry with Anna Hutchison anchors the film, making their alliance a compelling emotional thread.

Hutchison shines as Teena, portraying a woman shattered by trauma yet resilient in her fight for justice. Her quiet strength and vulnerability make Teena a relatable figure, though the script doesn’t fully explore her inner journey, a criticism echoed by reviewers who note the film’s surface-level treatment of her character. Talitha Bateman, as Bethie, delivers a heartbreaking performance, capturing the innocence and fear of a child caught in tragedy.

Don Johnson, as the sleazy defense attorney Jay Kirkpatrick, adds menace with his limited screen time, while supporting actors like Deborah Kara Unger (as Teena’s mother) and Charlene Tilton (as a nosy neighbor) flesh out the small-town dynamic. The ensemble is strong, but the script’s focus on action over character development limits their impact.

Themes and Tone: Justice, Trauma, and Moral Grayness

Vengeance: A Love Story grapples with heavy themes: the aftermath of Sєxual violence, the failures of the justice system, and the allure of vigilantism. The film attempts to balance raw action with emotional depth, drawing parallels to real-world cases of justice denied. However, its adaptation of Oates’ novella loses much of the source material’s psychological complexity, opting for a straightforward revenge narrative that feels formulaic at times.

The tone is unrelentingly grim, with moments of tenderness between Teena and Bethie providing brief respite. Critics argue that the film’s focus on John’s vigilante crusade overshadows Teena’s story, reducing her to a catalyst for his actions rather than a fully realized character. Still, the exploration of moral ambiguity—duty versus vengeance—adds weight to the narrative, making it resonate with fans of gritty thrillers.

Pacing and Execution: A Mixed Bag

The film’s 99-minute runtime keeps the story lean, but its pacing is uneven. The first half, focused on the ᴀssault and courtroom drama, builds tension effectively, but the shift to John’s vigilante mission feels rushed, with key plot points resolved too quickly. The climactic confrontations deliver the expected thrills, but some viewers may find the resolution predictable, leaning on familiar tropes of the genre.

Martin’s direction shines in intense, character-driven moments, but the film struggles to balance its action and drama elements. Critics note that the low budget occasionally shows in clunky transitions and underdeveloped subplots, such as John’s backstory, which feels tacked on. Despite these flaws, the film’s raw energy and emotional stakes keep it engaging.

Reception: A Divisive Thriller

Vengeance: A Love Story received mixed reviews, with a 25% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes (based on 20 reviews) and a 4.8/10 on IMDb. Critics praise Cage and Hutchison’s performances and the film’s gritty atmosphere but criticize its predictable plot and failure to capture the depth of Oates’ novella. Some reviewers call it a “serviceable B-movie” for action fans, while others find it exploitative and shallow. The X post’s 7.9/10 rating reflects enthusiasm from fans of Cage’s intense roles, though this contrasts with the broader critical consensus.

Where to Watch Vengeance: A Love Story (2017)

As of May 2025, Vengeance: A Love Story is available on streaming platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Tubi (check regional availability). It can also be rented or purchased on YouTube, Apple TV, and Fandango at Home.

Final Verdict: A Solid but Predictable Thriller

Vengeance: A Love Story (2017) is a gritty, emotionally charged thriller lifted by strong performances from Nicolas Cage and Anna Hutchison. Its stark visuals and raw action sequences make it a compelling watch for fans of vigilante dramas, but its predictable script and uneven pacing prevent it from reaching greatness. While it falls short of its literary source, it delivers enough intensity to satisfy genre enthusiasts.

Rating: 6.5/10
Perfect for: Fans of Death Wish, The Brave One, or Nicolas Cage’s darker roles.
Skip if: You seek a nuanced exploration of trauma or a fresh take on the genre.

Stream Vengeance: A Love Story for a tense, if formulaic, ride through a world of justice and retribution.

Keywords: Vengeance: A Love Story 2017, Nicolas Cage, Anna Hutchison, Don Johnson, vigilante thriller, crime drama, neo-noir, movie review 2025, Johnny Martin, Joyce Carol Oates.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.