Related Movies:

Freelancers (2012), directed by Jessy Terrero, is a hard-hitting action thriller that dives into the corrupt underbelly of New York City’s police force. Starring Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson as a rookie cop, Robert De Niro as a seasoned but crooked veteran, and Forest Whitaker in a supporting role, the film explores themes of loyalty, betrayal, and moral decay in a world of dirty cops and drug lords. With its intense shootouts, gritty atmosphere, and a powerhouse cast, Freelancers aims to deliver a raw crime saga but stumbles with a predictable script and uneven execution. This review examines why the film is a compelling yet flawed choice for action fans.

Plot Summary: A Rookie’s Descent into Corruption

Freelancers follows Jonas “Malo” Maldonado (Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson), a young man who joins the NYPD seeking justice after his father, a slain officer, leaves a legacy of honor. Malo is taken under the wing of Captain Joe Sarcone (Robert De Niro), his father’s former partner, who leads a rogue unit of cops running drugs and extorting criminals. As Malo navigates this web of corruption, he reconnects with childhood friend A.D. (Malcolm Goodwin) and faces pressure from LaRue (Forest Whitaker), a cunning informant with his own agenda. Torn between loyalty to Sarcone and his moral compᴀss, Malo’s quest for truth spirals into a violent showdown.

The screenplay by L. Philippe Cᴀsseus draws from urban crime dramas, echoing real-world issues of police corruption. However, the narrative leans heavily on clichés—crooked cops, predictable betrayals, and a rushed resolution—lacking the depth of genre classics like Training Day. Despite these shortcomings, the film’s fast pace and high-stakes action keep it engaging for fans of gritty thrillers.

Cinematography and Atmosphere: Neon Grit and Urban Chaos

Jessy Terrero, known for music videos, brings a stylized, gritty aesthetic to Freelancers. Cinematographer Igor Martinovic captures New York’s seedy underbelly with neon-lit streets, grimy bars, and shadowy alleys, creating a noir-like atmosphere that mirrors the characters’ moral decay. The camera’s kinetic energy shines in brutal shootouts and tense confrontations, with practical stunts adding a layer of realism that aligns with your appreciation for authentic action sequences in films like Crimson Tide or The Expendables.

The score by Reg B amplifies the tension with pulsating hip-hop beats and moody undertones, though it occasionally feels dated, reflecting the film’s early-2010s vibe. Some action scenes suffer from choppy editing or overly dark lighting, as noted in reviews, which can obscure the intensity. Still, the visual style and urban setting effectively immerse viewers in Malo’s chaotic world, making the city a vivid backdrop for the drama.

Performances: De Niro Shines, Others Struggle

Robert De Niro delivers a commanding performance as Sarcone, exuding menace and charisma as a corrupt cop who justifies his actions with twisted loyalty. His presence elevates every scene, recalling his iconic roles in crime dramas, though the script doesn’t fully capitalize on his talent. De Niro’s gravitas makes Sarcone a standout, aligning with your interest in strong performances from veteran actors like those in No Country for Old Men.

Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson, also a producer, brings raw grit to Malo but struggles with the role’s emotional demands. His earnest delivery works in action-heavy moments, but his inexperience shows in dramatic scenes, as critics have noted, drawing comparisons to less polished performances in similar B-movies. Forest Whitaker, as LaRue, adds intrigue with his cunning intensity, though his limited screen time feels like a missed opportunity, a sentiment echoed in reviews. Supporting actors like Malcolm Goodwin, Beau Garrett (as Malo’s love interest), and Anabelle Acosta contribute to the tension but are sidelined by the script’s focus on action over character depth.

Themes and Tone: Loyalty Versus Morality

Freelancers explores themes of loyalty, corruption, and the cost of justice, reflecting real-world urban crime issues. Malo’s journey—torn between his father’s legacy and Sarcone’s corrupt influence—mirrors the moral dilemmas you enjoyed in thrillers like Broken City or Red Sparrow. The film questions whether loyalty to a mentor can justify betrayal of one’s principles, though it rarely digs deeper than surface-level drama. The tone is relentlessly gritty, with bursts of violence punctuated by brief moments of camaraderie, but the lack of nuance makes it feel more like a B-movie than a profound crime saga.

The film’s urban setting and focus on police corruption evoke The Departed or Street Kings, but its simplistic narrative lacks their complexity. Still, its raw energy and moral stakes resonate with fans of action-driven crime dramas, appealing to your taste for high-stakes, character-driven conflicts.

Pacing and Execution: Fast but Formulaic

With a 96-minute runtime, Freelancers maintains a brisk pace, jumping from tense confrontations to explosive shootouts. The first act sets up Malo’s entry into the corrupt NYPD, while the second builds momentum through betrayals and escalating violence. However, the final act’s predictable showdown feels rushed, with plot holes—like Sarcone’s unchecked power—undermining credibility. Terrero’s direction prioritizes style and action, delivering thrilling sequences, but the script’s reliance on genre tropes and uneven character arcs limits its impact.

Technical flaws, such as inconsistent sound design and clichéd dialogue, draw criticism, as seen in reviews calling the film a “missed opportunity” despite its cast. Its direct-to-video release in many markets reflects its B-movie status, though its energy keeps it entertaining for action fans.

Reception: A Mixed Bag for Action Enthusiasts

Freelancers holds a 4.6/10 rating on IMDb and minimal critical coverage, with reviews like those on Rotten Tomatoes labeling it a “generic actioner” with wasted potential. Critics praise De Niro’s performance but criticize Jackson’s acting and the formulaic plot. The X post’s 7.8/10 rating aligns with fans who enjoy its gritty thrills and star power, similar to your enthusiasm for action films like The Expendables. However, the broader consensus sees it as a forgettable B-movie, overshadowed by stronger entries in the genre.

Where to Watch Freelancers (2012)

As of May 2025, Freelancers is available on streaming platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Tubi (check regional availability). It can also be rented or purchased on YouTube, Apple TV, and Fandango at Home.

Final Verdict: A Gritty but Forgettable Thriller

Freelancers (2012) is a hard-hitting action thriller elevated by Robert De Niro’s commanding performance and a gritty urban atmosphere but weighed down by a predictable script and uneven execution. Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson and Forest Whitaker add energy, but the lack of character depth and reliance on clichés keep it from greatness. Fans of Training Day or Street Kings will find its raw action and moral conflicts entertaining, but those seeking originality may be disappointed.

Rating: 6/10
Perfect for: Fans of action thrillers, Robert De Niro, or urban crime dramas.
Skip if: You prefer complex narratives or polished production values.

Stream Freelancers for a gritty, action-packed ride that burns bright but fades quickly in the crowded crime thriller landscape.

Keywords: Freelancers 2012, Robert De Niro, Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson, Forest Whitaker, action thriller, police corruption, New York crime, movie review 2025, Jessy Terrero, urban dram

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.