Related Movies:

Introduction to Red Notice: Global Hunt

Following the success of Red Notice (2021), which became Netflix’s most-watched film in its debut weekend, Red Notice: Global Hunt (2026) brings back Ryan Reynolds as Nolan Booth, the charming art thief with a knack for outsmarting everyone. Directed by Rawson Marshall Thurber, known for Central Intelligence and Skyscraper, this sequel expands the globe-trotting adventure with higher stakes, new characters, and a fresh heist. With Dwayne Johnson and Gal Gadot also returning, the film blends action, comedy, and suspense in a way that’s both familiar and exhilarating. Does Global Hunt surpᴀss the original? Let’s explore this thrilling sequel.

Plot Overview: A High-Stakes Global Chase

Red Notice: Global Hunt picks up with Nolan Booth (Ryan Reynolds) navigating the aftermath of the first film’s events, where he, FBI profiler John Hartley (Dwayne Johnson), and rival thief “The Bishop” (Gal Gadot) pulled off a daring heist. This time, Nolan is after the ultimate prize: a mythical artifact tied to an ancient secret society. The plot takes the trio across exotic locations, from the bustling markets of Istanbul to the icy cliffs of Patagonia, as they compete and collaborate in a race against a new villain, played with icy menace by Cillian Murphy.

The screenplay, co-written by Thurber and Zak Penn, is a rollercoaster of twists and betrayals, staying true to the original’s playful tone. The story revolves around Nolan’s attempts to outwit both his allies and enemies, with double-crosses that keep viewers guessing. While the plot leans on heist movie staples—hidden motives, elaborate cons, and last-minute reveals—it’s elevated by sharp dialogue and the cast’s undeniable charisma. The stakes feel higher this time, with a conspiracy that threatens global chaos, making Global Hunt a worthy successor.

Ryan Reynolds’ Charismatic Performance

Ryan Reynolds is the heart of Red Notice: Global Hunt, delivering a performance that’s equal parts snarky, clever, and endearing. His Nolan Booth remains a roguish conman, but this sequel adds layers to his character, hinting at a deeper motivation behind his relentless pursuit of the prize. Reynolds’ trademark wit shines in rapid-fire one-liners, many of which feel improvised, echoing his ᴅᴇᴀᴅpool persona without feeling repeтιтive. His ability to balance humor with moments of vulnerability makes Nolan a standout, even among the star-studded cast.

Dwayne Johnson and Gal Gadot also deliver strong performances, with Johnson’s Hartley playing the straight man to Reynolds’ chaos and Gadot’s Bishop exuding sleek menace. Newcomer Cillian Murphy brings a chilling intensity as the antagonist, a mastermind whose calm demeanor contrasts with Nolan’s frenetic energy. The ensemble’s chemistry, particularly between Reynolds and Johnson, drives the film’s comedic beats, while Gadot’s enigmatic presence keeps the tension high.

Action Sequences: Bigger and Bolder

Global Hunt takes the action to new heights with a series of breathtaking set pieces. From a high-speed boat chase through Venice’s canals to a daring heist in a Dubai skyscraper, the film delivers relentless thrills. Thurber, working with stunt coordinator Sam Hargrave, prioritizes practical effects where possible, giving the action a grounded yet spectacular feel. A standout sequence involves Nolan navigating a collapsing ancient temple, dodging traps in a nod to Indiana Jones, complete with Reynolds whistling the iconic theme.

The fight choreography is crisp, blending martial arts, parkour, and creative use of environments. One memorable scene sees Nolan and Hartley battling mercenaries in a crowded Istanbul bazaar, using everything from spice jars to rugs as weapons. While some sequences push believability, the film’s lighthearted tone embraces the absurdity, much like the Mission: Impossible series. Fans of the original’s action will find Global Hunt bigger and bolder, with enough variety to keep the adrenaline pumping.

Themes and Emotional Core

Beneath the heists and humor, Red Notice: Global Hunt explores themes of trust, loyalty, and redemption. Nolan’s journey is as much about proving his worth as it is about securing the artifact. Flashbacks reveal more about his past, adding emotional weight to his devil-may-care atтιтude. The dynamic between Nolan, Hartley, and Bishop is built on uneasy alliances, with each character questioning the others’ motives. This tension, coupled with Murphy’s villainous scheming, keeps the stakes personal as well as global.

The film avoids heavy-handed drama, maintaining its breezy tone while offering just enough depth to make the characters relatable. The camaraderie between Nolan and Hartley, in particular, feels like a true evolution from the first film, grounded in mutual respect rather than just necessity. This focus on character dynamics sets Global Hunt apart from more generic action flicks.

Cinematography and Soundtrack

Cinematographer Markus Förderer captures the film’s global scope with vibrant visuals, from the golden hues of Istanbul to the stark whites of Patagonia. The action is sH๏τ with dynamic camera work, including drone sH๏τs and long takes that immerse viewers in the chaos. The film’s pacing benefits from clear, well-edited sequences that avoid the disorienting quick cuts of lesser action movies.

The soundtrack, composed by Steve Jablonsky, blends pulsing electronic beats with orchestral flourishes, amplifying the film’s energy. A catchy leitmotif for Nolan adds a playful touch, while the score’s intensity underscores the high-stakes heists. The sound design, from the clatter of gunfire to the roar of collapsing structures, enhances the immersive experience.

Weaknesses: Familiar Territory and Overstuffed Plot

While Global Hunt is a blast, it’s not without flaws. The plot, though entertaining, treads familiar heist movie ground, with twists that seasoned viewers may predict. The sheer number of double-crosses can feel overwhelming, occasionally muddying the narrative. Some supporting characters, including an Interpol agent played by Ritu Arya, are underutilized, serving more as plot devices than fully fleshed-out roles.

The film also leans heavily on Reynolds’ charisma, which, while effective, risks overshadowing the ensemble at times. Fans of the original may find the formula—quips, chases, betrayals—familiar, but the execution is polished enough to keep it engaging. These issues don’t derail the fun but prevent Global Hunt from fully transcending the genre.

Comparisons to Other Heist Thrillers

Red Notice: Global Hunt builds on the original’s blend of Indiana Jones, National Treasure, and Ocean’s Eleven. Its globe-trotting adventure and witty banter recall Mission: Impossible, while the focus on art theft echoes The Thomas Crown Affair. Compared to the first Red Notice, the sequel feels more ambitious, with higher stakes and a тιԍнтer script, though it retains the same playful vibe. Reynolds’ performance sets it apart from more serious heist films, making it a lighter, more accessible entry in the genre.

Why You Should Watch Red Notice: Global Hunt

Red Notice: Global Hunt is a thrilling, crowd-pleasing sequel that delivers on action, humor, and star power. Ryan Reynolds is at his charismatic best, supported by a strong ensemble and inventive set pieces. While it doesn’t reinvent the heist genre, its polished execution and relentless energy make it a perfect popcorn flick. Whether you’re a fan of the original or new to the series, Global Hunt is a wild ride worth taking.

Final Verdict

Red Notice: Global Hunt (2026) is a slick, entertaining sequel that elevates the original with bigger action and sharper wit. Ryan Reynolds steals the show, while the globe-trotting adventure and twist-filled plot keep you hooked. Minor flaws aside, this is a must-watch for fans of heist thrillers and action-comedy.

Rating: 8/10

Keywords: Red Notice: Global Hunt, Ryan Reynolds, heist thriller, action comedy, Dwayne Johnson, Gal Gadot, Rawson Marshall Thurber, 2026 films, Cillian Murphy, Netflix movies, globe-trotting adventure, movie review

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.