“Snake Eyes: G.I. Joe Origins” (2021) attempts to breathe new life into the G.I. Joe franchise by offering an origin story for one of its most iconic characters. Directed by Robert Schwentke and starring Henry Golding in the тιтular role, the film explores the journey of Snake Eyes, a lone fighter seeking vengeance and purpose. However, while the movie brings in fresh elements of martial arts, loyalty, and betrayal, it struggles with its idenтιтy between a grounded samurai epic and a flashy blockbuster.

Henry Golding delivers a compelling performance, showcasing the emotional and physical struggles of a man torn between personal revenge and a newfound sense of honor. His portrayal brings a more human and vulnerable side to Snake Eyes, a character traditionally depicted as a silent, masked warrior. The film introduces Tommy Arashikage, played by Andrew Koji, who later becomes Storm Shadow, Snake Eyes’ greatest rival and former brother-in-arms. Their dynamic is one of the movie’s strongest aspects, as it adds depth to their eventual feud.

The action sequences, heavily inspired by classic samurai films and modern martial arts cinema, offer stylish choreography and well-executed set pieces. The sword fights and hand-to-hand combat scenes are engaging, though at times, excessive shaky cam and quick cuts hinder the clarity of movement. The film’s cinematography and production design do a solid job of immersing the audience in the world of the Arashikage clan, blending elements of traditional Japanese aesthetics with a modern action thriller feel.

Where Snake Eyes falters is in its storytelling and connection to the larger G.I. Joe universe. While the film presents an intriguing character study, it struggles with pacing and inconsistent tonal shifts. The inclusion of G.I. Joe and Cobra elements feels somewhat forced, making the movie feel like it is neither a pure origin story nor a full-fledged G.I. Joe film. The villains, particularly The Baroness (Úrsula Corberó) and Kenta (Takehiro Hira), lack depth, serving more as narrative devices than compelling antagonists.

Another divisive aspect is the portrayal of Snake Eyes himself. Traditionally, he is known for his unwavering loyalty and discipline, but in this film, his choices are often questionable, making it harder for longtime fans to root for him. His betrayal of Tommy and the consequences that follow are compelling but also raise concerns about whether the film truly captures the essence of the character as he is known in the G.I. Joe mythos.

Visually, Snake Eyes is impressive, with strong production design and a unique blend of neon-lit urban settings and traditional Japanese temples. The CGI, while not groundbreaking, serves its purpose in enhancing the action scenes. The film’s score complements its tone, though it does not leave a lasting impact.

Overall, Snake Eyes: G.I. Joe Origins is an ambitious attempt to reinvent a fan-favorite character with a grounded and personal backstory. While Henry Golding’s charisma, strong action sequences, and the rivalry between Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow add intrigue, the film ultimately suffers from uneven pacing, underdeveloped villains, and a narrative that struggles to balance its personal story with its franchise obligations. Despite its flaws, it remains an entertaining martial arts action film that might appeal to casual viewers but leaves hardcore G.I. Joe fans divided.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

Hoxne Hoard treasures. Photo by Helen Simonsson CC by SA-2.0

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

Hoxne Village. Photo by Duncan Grey CC BY-SA 2.0

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

Hoxne Hoard: Display case at the British Museum showing a reconstruction of the arrangement of the hoard treasure when excavated in 1992. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Hoxne Hoard: Coins. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

The silver “Hoxne Tigress” – the broken-off handle from an unknown object – is the best known single piece out of some 15,000 in the hoard. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

A silver-gilt spoon with a marine beast from the Hoxne Hoard. Currently in the British Museum. Photo by JMiall CC BY-SA 3.0

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Reconstruction of the Hoxne treasure chest. Photo by Mike Peel CC-BY-SA-4.0

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

Two gold bracelets from the Hoxne Hoard, in the British Museum. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Three silver-gilt Roman piperatoria or pepper pots from the Hoxne Hoard on display at the British Museum

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

Two toiletry items, one in the shape of a crane-like bird; the other with an empty socket, probably for bristles for a makeup brush. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.