Backcountry (2015) – A Terrifying Survival Thriller in the Wilderness

Introduction: A Gripping Tale of Survival and Nature’s Relentless Forces

Released in 2015, Backcountry is a chilling survival thriller that takes audiences deep into the wilderness, where the true dangers aren’t just the wild animals, but also the overwhelming power of nature and the human psyche. Directed by Adam MacDonald, Backcountry is a slow-burn, tense film that explores the human instinct for survival when faced with the merciless beauty of the natural world. With an eerie atmosphere, sparse dialogue, and intense performances, this film keeps the audience on the edge of their seat, creating a deeply unsettling experience.

Backcountry is a story of a couple’s ill-fated camping trip in the Canadian wilderness, where the dangers of the unknown and the primal instincts of both man and beast collide. Through a relentless and terrifying series of events, the film builds tension, forcing the characters—and the audience—into a fight for survival. This review will explore the plot, the performances, and the themes that make Backcountry an effective and nerve-wracking thriller.

Plot Summary: A Wilderness Adventure Gone Horribly Wrong

The story of Backcountry centers on Jenn (Missy Peregrym) and her boyfriend Alex (Jeff Roop), who decide to go on a hiking trip in the wilds of Northern Ontario. Alex, an experienced outdoorsman, convinces Jenn to leave behind the comforts of civilization for a secluded, off-the-beaten-path hike into the wilderness. What begins as a seemingly innocent weekend adventure quickly turns into a fight for survival.

As the couple navigates the dense forest, they become increasingly lost and disoriented. The tension between Alex and Jenn begins to mount, as Jenn grows more uncomfortable with the trip’s direction, and the lack of proper navigation or preparation starts to become apparent. Despite Alex’s reᴀssurances, the couple soon realize they are far off course, and their journey takes a more dangerous turn.

Their situation takes a turn for the worse when they encounter a mᴀssive black bear in the forest. What begins as a simple encounter with nature’s beauty quickly escalates into a nightmarish fight for survival. The bear becomes an ever-present threat, stalking them through the woods as they try to find their way back to safety. The couple’s resourcefulness, trust in each other, and resolve are tested to their limits as they confront the unforgiving environment and fight to stay alive.

Backcountry isn’t just about a bear attack; it’s about the brutal realization that nature, in all its grandeur and beauty, is indifferent to human life. The film takes the audience on a journey where the characters’ fear, desperation, and relationship dynamics play out in the face of an unseen, relentless force. The film’s pacing builds tension gradually, with moments of calm before the storm, creating an oppressive feeling of dread throughout.

Characters: Survival, Tension, and Personal Struggles

While the setting of Backcountry is a character in its own right, the film also relies heavily on its two main characters—Jenn and Alex. Their personalities, their evolving dynamic, and their responses to the challenges they face in the wilderness form the emotional core of the film.

• Jenn (Missy Peregrym): Jenn is a city girl, uncomfortable with the ruggedness of the wilderness and unsure of her ability to handle the extreme conditions Alex has promised. Missy Peregrym portrays Jenn as both vulnerable and strong, with a natural emotional progression as she becomes more and more resourceful in the face of danger. Her fear and frustration with Alex’s lack of caution are palpable, making her character relatable. Jenn’s emotional journey from reluctant participant to a survivor facing her darkest fears is a key aspect of the film’s emotional depth.
• Alex (Jeff Roop): Alex, Jenn’s boyfriend, is an experienced outdoorsman who believes his skills and knowledge will keep them safe. Jeff Roop’s portrayal of Alex is that of a well-meaning, confident, but ultimately flawed man whose overconfidence leads to mistakes. While his character’s flaws add tension to the relationship, his transformation throughout the film—going from a confident leader to someone overwhelmed by the situation—adds complexity to the narrative. As Alex’s choices become more questionable, his relationship with Jenn is tested, and his desire to protect her turns into a desperate attempt to save them both.
• The Black Bear (nature itself): While the bear is the immediate antagonist, Backcountry does an excellent job of making nature itself the true enemy. The bear, though terrifying, is simply an animal acting on instinct. The real horror comes from the characters’ realization that the wilderness is an unpredictable force that cannot be controlled or reasoned with. The bear’s presence is symbolic of the unpredictable dangers that lie within nature, as well as the desperation and fear that grow in response to these threats.

Themes: Survival, Nature’s Indifference, and the Human Spirit

At its core, Backcountry is a story about survival. The film explores what happens when people are thrust into an environment that is completely foreign and hostile, stripped of the comforts of civilization. It delves into the primal instincts that surface when survival is at stake and the ways in which individuals are tested—both physically and emotionally—when they are pushed to their limits.

• Survival in the Wilderness: The film’s primary theme is survival in the wilderness. Backcountry shows how quickly a seemingly simple hiking trip can devolve into a fight for life when faced with the raw forces of nature. The characters are forced to rely on their wits, strength, and instincts to navigate the dangers surrounding them. The film’s tension comes from the fact that nature doesn’t care about the characters’ plans, wishes, or desires—what matters is how they respond to the challenges before them.
• Nature’s Indifference: One of the most unsettling aspects of Backcountry is its portrayal of nature as an indifferent force. Unlike films where nature is anthropomorphized or made into a villain, Backcountry shows that nature, in its vastness and unpredictability, doesn’t operate according to human desires. The bear is not out for revenge or malice; it is simply trying to survive, just as the humans are. This theme highlights the human vulnerability in the face of nature’s power and its lack of concern for human suffering.
• The Human Spirit and Relationships: The dynamics between Jenn and Alex serve as an emotional anchor in the film. As their relationship is tested in the wilderness, the film explores themes of trust, reliance, and the fragility of human connection. The tension between the characters—particularly their differing levels of preparedness for the trip—adds emotional complexity to the survival thriller. Their ability to rely on each other in moments of extreme stress ultimately plays a significant role in how they confront the dangers they face.

Cinematography and Direction: Tension Through Atmosphere

The cinematography of Backcountry is integral to its atmosphere of dread and isolation. The film was sH๏τ on location in the forests of Ontario, and the expansive wilderness is presented as both beautiful and terrifying. The wide sH๏τs of dense woods and remote locations create a feeling of being trapped in an endless, intimidating environment. The isolated settings highlight the couple’s vulnerability and emphasize the feeling of being alone in an indifferent world.

The direction by Adam MacDonald is patient, allowing the tension to build gradually. The film takes its time establishing the peacefulness of nature before unleashing the full force of the danger it holds. The bear encounters are terrifying, with the pacing and tension building slowly to create a sense of impending doom. The lack of a constant score adds to the feeling of isolation, as the silence of the forest is only broken by the sounds of the bear and the characters’ frantic attempts to escape.

Conclusion: A Terrifying and Realistic Thriller

Backcountry is a survival thriller that stands out for its chilling realism and its ability to instill genuine fear in the audience. The film’s portrayal of nature’s indifference, combined with the human struggle for survival, creates a tense and unnerving atmosphere that keeps viewers on the edge of their seats. The strong performances from Missy Peregrym and Jeff Roop add emotional depth to the film, making it more than just a straightforward thriller.

Ultimately, Backcountry is a harrowing reminder of the fragility of human life in the face of nature’s unpredictable power. It’s a story of survival, fear, and the human spirit, and one that will leave viewers thinking long after the credits roll. If you’re a fan of survival films that focus on realistic, intense scenarios, Backcountry is a must-watch for its unnerving portrayal of how vulnerable we truly are in the wilderness.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.