Orphan (2009) Movie Review: A Chilling Psychological Thriller

Released on July 24, 2009, Orphan, directed by Jaume Collet-Serra, is a psychological horror-thriller that captivates audiences with its sinister plot twists and eerie atmosphere. Combining elements of suspense, horror, and mystery, Orphan is a film that leaves viewers questioning their ᴀssumptions about innocence, motherhood, and the darkness that lies beneath the surface.

Plot Overview:

Orphan follows the story of Kate (Vera Farmiga) and John Coleman (Peter Sarsgaard), a couple who, after the tragic loss of their young daughter, decide to adopt a child. They bring home Esther (Isabelle Fuhrman), a seemingly sweet and intelligent 9-year-old girl from a convent. However, as Esther settles into her new home, strange occurrences start to unravel, leading Kate to suspect that Esther might not be as innocent as she appears.

Esther’s increasingly erratic and unsettling behavior escalates, and Kate becomes determined to uncover the truth about Esther’s past. As the tension mounts, Kate discovers a horrifying secret that turns everything she thought she knew about her adopted daughter upside down.

An Unpredictable Thriller with Intense Suspense

From the very beginning, Orphan grabs the viewer’s attention by setting up an atmosphere of unease. The opening scenes introduce the Colemans, a family still grieving their loss, and provide a glimpse into their fractured emotional state. This sense of vulnerability creates an emotional backdrop that makes the events that follow even more disturbing.

The film builds suspense gradually, using subtle but effective techniques to keep the audience on edge. The pacing is deliberate, allowing tension to simmer beneath the surface. The central mystery surrounding Esther is revealed in layers, with each new revelation pulling the audience deeper into the psychological horror.

Director Jaume Collet-Serra employs тιԍнт framing, dim lighting, and eerie sound design to create an oppressive atmosphere that keeps the viewer feeling uneasy throughout. There is an ever-present sense of dread that builds as Esther’s true nature slowly emerges. The film masterfully uses suspense to explore themes of motherhood, family, and the secrets that people keep hidden from each other.

Outstanding Performances:

Vera Farmiga delivers a stellar performance as Kate, the grieving mother who becomes increasingly paranoid and obsessed with uncovering the truth about Esther. Farmiga’s portrayal of a woman on the edge is both believable and heartbreaking. Her character’s vulnerability and maternal instincts drive the emotional core of the film, and she brings a sense of authenticity to her role that keeps the audience invested in her journey.

Peter Sarsgaard, playing John, provides a strong performance as well, embodying the role of a father who is caught between his wife’s suspicions and his desire to believe in their new daughter. The dynamic between Kate and John is complicated and believable, with each character navigating their own emotional struggles.

However, it is Isabelle Fuhrman who truly steals the show as Esther. Fuhrman’s portrayal of the disturbed young girl is nothing short of mesmerizing. With her cold, calculating demeanor and hauntingly convincing performance, Fuhrman brings Esther to life in a way that is both chilling and fascinating. The complexity of her character keeps the audience guessing, as they are never quite sure whether Esther is a victim of circumstance or something far more sinister.

Twists and Turns:

One of the most notable aspects of Orphan is its shocking twist. While the film starts as a typical psychological thriller about a troubled adopted child, it quickly morphs into something far more unexpected and disturbing. The revelation about Esther’s true idenтιтy is a game-changer that redefines the entire narrative. This plot twist not only catches the audience off guard but also forces them to reconsider the events that have unfolded up until that point.

Without giving too much away, the twist is executed flawlessly, and it elevates Orphan from a conventional horror film into something far more thought-provoking and disturbing. It explores the dark side of human nature, the lengths to which people will go to hide their secrets, and the consequences of underestimating others.

Themes and Symbolism:

At its core, Orphan is a film about the complexities of motherhood and the dangers of blind trust. The film explores the lengths to which a mother will go to protect her family, even when it means confronting the darkest aspects of her own emotions. Kate’s struggle to protect her family, despite her grief and trauma, adds depth to the film’s central narrative.

Additionally, Orphan tackles the theme of deception, both on a personal and societal level. Esther’s ability to manipulate those around her is a testament to the film’s exploration of the dangers of underestimating others. It also highlights the idea that things are not always as they seem on the surface, and the people we trust the most can sometimes be the ones who deceive us the most.

The film also delves into themes of idenтιтy and self-perception. Esther’s transformation from a sweet, innocent child into a malevolent force challenges our preconceived notions about what it means to be a child, an adult, and a parent. It forces the audience to grapple with the idea that appearances can be deceiving, and our ᴀssumptions about others are often flawed.

The Psychological Horror Element:

While Orphan certainly has elements of traditional horror, it is at its best as a psychological thriller. The film plays on the viewer’s fear of the unknown, using psychological tension to create unease rather than relying solely on jump scares or gore. The horror in Orphan is rooted in the emotional manipulation and psychological torment that Esther inflicts on her adoptive family.

Esther’s behavior is unsettling not because of overtly violent actions, but because of the way she subtly undermines those around her. Her manipulation of John, her cruel treatment of the family’s other children, and her ability to plant seeds of doubt in Kate’s mind all contribute to the film’s sense of horror. The viewer is never quite sure whether Esther is truly dangerous or if Kate is simply losing her grip on reality, which makes the suspense even more palpable.

The Cinematic Style:

Jaume Collet-Serra’s direction in Orphan is deliberate and effective in creating a sense of dread. The cinematography is moody and atmospheric, with much of the film taking place in dimly lit, isolated settings that add to the overall feeling of confinement. The use of shadows and тιԍнт framing creates a sense of claustrophobia, making the viewer feel trapped alongside the characters.

The film’s editing is also тιԍнт and precise, maintaining a steady pace that keeps the tension high throughout. There is a constant undercurrent of unease that builds to a fever pitch as the film progresses, culminating in a finale that is both shocking and satisfying.

Critical Reception:

Upon its release, Orphan received generally positive reviews from critics, who praised the performances, particularly Fuhrman’s portrayal of Esther, and the film’s unexpected twists. The film was lauded for its ability to subvert expectations and provide a fresh take on the psychological horror genre. However, some critics found the plot twists to be somewhat far-fetched, and others were put off by the darker, more disturbing aspects of the film.

Despite this, Orphan became a commercial success, grossing over $78 million worldwide against a production budget of $20 million. Its success has led to discussions about a potential sequel, though nothing has been confirmed as of yet.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, Orphan is a highly effective psychological thriller that excels in building tension and delivering unexpected twists. The film’s strong performances, particularly by Isabelle Fuhrman as Esther, help elevate it beyond a typical horror movie and into something more complex and unsettling. The exploration of themes such as motherhood, deception, and idenтιтy adds depth to the story, making it more than just a simple scare-fest.

If you’re a fan of psychological thrillers that keep you on the edge of your seat, Orphan is a must-watch. It’s a film that will leave you questioning everything you thought you knew about family, trust, and the darkness that can lurk within even the most innocent-seeming individuals. With its shocking twists and gripping narrative, Orphan is a haunting and unforgettable film that will stay with you long after the credits roll.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.