The Woman in the Window (2021), directed by Joe Wright and based on A. J. Finn’s novel of the same name, is a psychological thriller that blends suspense, mystery, and drama in a way that keeps the audience on edge. The film stars Amy Adams as Anna Fox, a woman who, after a traumatic event, becomes agoraphobic and spends her days isolated in her New York City townhouse, peering through the windows at her neighbors. Her obsessive surveillance of the lives around her becomes her only connection to the outside world, but it also leads her into a complex and dangerous situation when she believes she witnesses a crime.

Anna, a former child psychologist, is grappling with personal demons, including the dissolution of her marriage and the unresolved trauma from a past incident. Her agoraphobia makes it impossible for her to leave her home, and she spends her time drinking wine, watching old movies, and observing her neighbors through the windows. One evening, she sees a shocking event: her neighbor Jane Russell (Julianne Moore) appears to be stabbed by her husband, Alistair Russell (Gary Oldman). However, when Anna tries to alert the police, she discovers that Jane is nowhere to be found, and her account of the events is dismissed as the product of an overactive imagination—complicated by Anna’s mental state and her reliance on alcohol and medication.

As Anna becomes more convinced that she saw a murder, she begins to investigate on her own. She befriends Ethan Russell (Fred Hechinger), Jane’s son, and tries to piece together the mystery. However, as she digs deeper, she finds that nothing is as it seems. The more she uncovers, the more Anna’s own reliability is questioned. Is she truly witnessing a crime, or is she simply unraveling due to her isolation and mental health issues? The film expertly blurs the lines between reality and delusion, keeping both Anna and the audience guessing.

The film’s atmosphere is one of suffocating tension and claustrophobia, with Anna’s physical and mental isolation mirrored in the narrow, confined spaces of her home. Joe Wright’s direction captures the feeling of being trapped in both the literal and figurative sense, as Anna becomes more consumed by her obsession with the Russell family and her suspicions of foul play. The narrative is steeped in noir-style visual cues, with dim lighting, shadowy interiors, and dramatic close-ups that enhance the sense of paranoia and mistrust.

Amy Adams delivers a powerful performance as Anna, fully capturing the character’s fragile emotional state and the complexity of her descent into obsession. Her portrayal of a woman trying to hold onto her sanity while being consumed by fear, guilt, and the pressure of her own suspicions is compelling. Throughout the film, Anna is both sympathetic and unreliable, making it difficult for the audience to fully trust her perspective. This adds a layer of uncertainty to the narrative, as we are forced to question not only the events unfolding on screen but also Anna’s ability to interpret them accurately.

The supporting cast is equally strong, with Julianne Moore playing the enigmatic Jane, who appears as a lifeline to Anna’s otherwise lonely existence. Gary Oldman portrays the chilling and enigmatic Alistair, a man whose true intentions are shrouded in mystery. Jennifer Jason Leigh also delivers a memorable performance as Anna’s therapist, providing a grounding influence that offers Anna some emotional support while simultaneously raising questions about the ethics and reliability of therapy itself. The interactions between these characters create an unsettling tension that adds to the film’s sense of paranoia.

The twists in The Woman in the Window come fast and furiously, with each revelation leading to another unexpected turn. The film plays with the audience’s expectations, creating a constant sense of unease and disorientation. Just when you think the mystery is about to be solved, the narrative shifts, revealing new layers of deception and intrigue. The finale, in particular, is a shocking culmination that brings everything into sharp focus but leaves the viewer questioning how much they truly understood about Anna’s perceptions throughout the film.

Despite its slow burn pacing, The Woman in the Window excels at building suspense through its carefully crafted atmosphere and nuanced performances. The film is a study in unreliable narration, using Anna’s agoraphobia and trauma to create an emotional and psychological labyrinth that mirrors the mystery at its core. The questions about reality versus illusion, memory versus truth, and sanity versus madness keep the viewer engaged, making the film more than just a typical thriller.

However, the film has been met with mixed reviews, with some critics praising its suspense and performances, particularly Amy Adams’ nuanced portrayal of Anna, while others have criticized it for being overly familiar and formulaic. The reliance on well-worn tropes of the “unreliable narrator” and the slow burn structure may feel predictable to some, especially those familiar with other psychological thrillers in a similar vein.

In the end, The Woman in the Window is an atmospheric and suspenseful film that explores themes of isolation, trauma, and the thin line between reality and delusion. It is a tense ride that will keep audiences guessing about what is truly happening until the very end. While its twists may not come as a complete surprise to thriller aficionados, the film’s performances and psychological depth make it a compelling experience for those who enjoy a slow-burning mystery.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.