Related Movies:

Rogue (2020), directed by M.J. Bᴀssett, is an action thriller that attempts to blend high-stakes mercenary missions with survival horror, starring Megan Fox as a battle-hardened team leader and Philip Winchester as her loyal second-in-command. Released digitally on August 28, 2020, and on Blu-ray and DVD on September 1, 2020, the film follows a squad of mercenaries facing rebels and a rogue lioness in the East African grᴀsslands. The Official Trailer, released July 21, 2020, promised explosive action and a fierce Megan Fox, but the final product has divided audiences. This 2000-word review explores the film’s plot, performances, direction, themes, and reception, optimized for SEO to guide viewers seeking insights into this polarizing B-movie.

Introduction to Rogue: A Mercenary Mission Gone Wild

Rogue aims to carve a niche in the action thriller genre, combining the gritty realism of Black Hawk Down with the primal terror of The Ghost and the Darkness. The Official Trailer, shared by Lionsgate on YouTube, showcases Megan Fox as Samantha “Sam” O’Hara, leading a rescue mission in Africa that spirals into chaos. With a runtime of 1 hour 46 minutes and an R rating, the film leans into violence, profanity, and animal horror, targeting fans of low-budget action flicks. Despite its ambitions, Rogue struggles with poor CGI, uneven writing, and casting controversies, though it offers moments of entertainment for forgiving viewers.

Produced by South African company Mannequin Pictures, Rogue was initially a small project by Bᴀssett and her daughter Isabella, but it became a star vehicle after Fox signed on. Filmed in December 2019 on a game farm near Johannesburg, the film grossed $1.79 million in U.S. DVD and Blu-ray sales in its first two weeks. Let’s dive into why Rogue is a mixed bag and whether it’s worth your time.

Plot Overview: Hostages, Rebels, and Ravenous Lions

Rogue follows Samantha O’Hara (Megan Fox), a seasoned mercenary leading a diverse team—Joey Kasinski (Philip Winchester), Elijah Dekker (Brandon Auret), Mike Barasa (Greg Kriek), Bo Yinn (Kenneth Fok), and Pata (Sisanda Henna)—on a mission to rescue Asilia Wilson (Jessica Sutton), the kidnapped daughter of a governor, and her schoolmates Chloe (Calli Taylor) and Tessa (Isabel Bᴀssett) from a terrorist cell led by Zalaam (Adam Deacon), affiliated with al-Shabaab. The team infiltrates the insurgents’ camp in East Africa, but the mission goes awry when their extraction fails, leaving them stranded.

Hunted by Zalaam’s forces, the squad takes refuge in an abandoned farm, only to discover it’s the hunting ground of a bloodthirsty lioness, displaced by poachers. The film shifts from a tactical thriller to a survival horror as the team faces both human and animal threats. O’Hara must keep her team and the hostages alive while confronting her own past traumas, hinted at through brief flashbacks. The trailer’s glimpses of gunfire, explosions, and a menacing CGI lion set expectations for a relentless pace, but the film often leans on melodrama and clichés, diluting its intensity.

The narrative wraps with a predictable showdown, though a late knife fight offers a flicker of creative choreography. While the premise—mercenaries versus rebels and nature—has potential, Rogue struggles to balance its dual threats, with the lioness subplot feeling underutilized.

Performances: Megan Fox and Ensemble in the Spotlight

Megan Fox as Samantha O’Hara

Megan Fox, known for Transformers and Jennifer’s Body, takes on a rare action-hero role as O’Hara. Her casting sparked debate, with X posts questioning her fit as a “bad-ᴀss mercenary.” Fox’s performance is polarizing: some Amazon reviewers praise her for surprising emotional depth, with one noting she “did better than I expected,” while others, like an IMDb critique, call her “expressionless” and accuse her of “cashing a paycheck.”

Fox brings a stoic intensity to O’Hara, but her polished appearance—minimal battle wear and visible makeup—undermines the gritty realism. Her line delivery, often monotone, struggles with the script’s clichéd dialogue, like calling hostages “ᴀssets.” Still, moments of vulnerability, especially in interactions with the hostages, hint at untapped potential. Fans on X suggest Fox excels in roles like psycH๏τic villains (Jennifer’s Body), and Rogue might have benefited from a less serious tone.

Philip Winchester as Joey Kasinski

Philip Winchester (Strike Back) plays Joey, the team’s loyal and level-headed second-in-command. Winchester delivers a grounded performance, bringing authenticity to the mercenary role with his physicality and tactical demeanor. His chemistry with Fox is functional but lacks spark, and his character’s arc feels underdeveloped. X users noted his early trailer appearance, with some speculating his character’s fate based on a dramatic “boo” moment. Winchester’s effort elevates the film, but he’s underused, with little backstory to flesh out Joey.

Supporting Cast

The ensemble adds color but is hampered by thin writing. Jessica Sutton shines as Asilia, bringing defiance to the governor’s daughter, while Calli Taylor and Isabel Bᴀssett (the director’s daughter) are serviceable as Chloe and Tessa, though their roles lean on damsel-in-distress tropes. Greg Kriek’s Mike Barasa and Brandon Auret’s Elijah provide gruff energy, but their confrontational banter feels forced. Sisanda Henna’s Pata, a Maasai ex-jihadist, and Kenneth Fok’s Bo offer intriguing backstories, but the script barely explores them. Adam Deacon’s Zalaam is a cartoonish villain, with a “weird ᴀss speech” before a key moment drawing laughs on Amazon reviews.

M.J. Bᴀssett’s Direction: Vision Undermined by Budget

M.J. Bᴀssett, known for Solomon Kane and Silent Hill: Revelation, directs Rogue with ambition but is constrained by a modest budget. The South African game farm setting, 40 miles from Johannesburg, provides a rugged backdrop, and Bᴀssett’s use of natural lighting and wide sH๏τs captures the savanna’s vastness. However, the film’s action sequences—endless gunfire and a poorly lit knife fight—lack creativity, with IMDb reviews calling them “boring” and “B-grade.”

The lioness, a central hook, is a major letdown due to shoddy CGI. The trailer’s lion sH๏τs looked pᴀssable, but the film’s extended sequences expose the “lazy” effects, as noted on IMDb and Amazon. Bᴀssett’s attempt to blend action and horror falters, with the lioness underused compared to genre classics like Jaws or Crawl. A Rotten Tomatoes critic lamented the lack of “chills or suspense” in animal attack scenes.

Bᴀssett, who co-wrote the script with her daughter Isabella, infuses personal touches, like O’Hara’s trauma, but the dialogue is a weak point. Lines like “Boss” and “ᴀsset” feel ripped from generic cop shows, and exposition is heavy-handed. Bᴀssett’s vision—a “Jaws-meets-war movie” per an Amazon review—has potential, but execution falls short. Her work on Ash vs. Evil ᴅᴇᴀᴅ shows she can handle campy action, and X posts jokingly hyped her involvement, but Rogue takes itself too seriously.

Themes and Cultural Impact: Survival and Representation

Rogue touches on themes of survival, leadership, and redemption. O’Hara’s struggle to protect her team and confront her past mirrors classic action-hero arcs, while the lioness symbolizes nature’s unpredictability. The film also nods to geopolitical issues, with al-Shabaab’s presence and human trafficking as plot drivers, but these are surface-level, serving as set-dressing for action.

The diverse cast—South African, British, and American actors, including Maasai and Asian characters—offers representation, a rarity for B-movies. However, the script’s failure to develop characters like Pata or Bo limits impact. The film’s release during the 2020 pandemic, via digital and limited theatrical runs, restricted its cultural footprint, though it found a niche on streaming platforms. X posts reflect mixed sentiment, with some praising the “entertaining mess” and others slamming Fox’s casting.

Rogue’s $1.79 million in early physical sales shows modest demand, likely driven by Fox’s star power. Reddit threads and X posts suggest fans wanted Fox in a role suiting her strengths, like a “Sєxy spy” or comedic part, rather than a gritty mercenary. The film’s 4.2/10 IMDb rating and 14% Rotten Tomatoes score reflect critical disdain, but some user reviews on Amazon call it a “fun popcorn flick.”

Production and Marketing: A Star Vehicle on a Budget

Originally a pet project by Bᴀssett and her daughter, Rogue scaled up when producers saw star potential, casting Fox after reportedly pitching to 20 other actresses. Filming wrapped in December 2019, with Lionsgate handling distribution. The marketing leaned heavily on Fox, with the trailer emphasizing her action-hero turn and the lion threat. A second trailer, released July 31, 2020, doubled down on explosions and animal attacks.

Lionsgate’s campaign, including YouTube and Vimeo uploads, targeted action fans, with IGN hyping Fox’s “battle-hardened” role. Reddit posts on r/movies and r/trailers garnered 47 and 5 votes, respectively, but comments were harsh, calling the trailer “entertaining” but the execution “complete sнιт.” The film’s digital-first release aligned with 2020’s pandemic trends, competing with The New Mutants and Fatima.

Strengths and Weaknesses: What Works and What Doesn’t

Strengths

• Premise: Mercenaries facing rebels and a lioness is a fresh, if underexplored, concept.
• Diverse Cast: The multinational team adds inclusivity, with Sutton and Henna standing out.
• Fox’s Effort: Despite criticism, Fox shows flashes of emotional depth.
• Setting: The South African savanna provides a striking, authentic backdrop.

Weaknesses

• Poor CGI: The lioness’s shoddy effects undermine the horror element.
• Weak Script: Clichéd dialogue and heavy exposition drag the pacing.
• Fox’s Miscasting: Her polished look and monotone delivery clash with the mercenary role.
• Uneven Tone: The film wavers between serious thriller and B-movie camp.

SEO Optimization: Why Rogue Matters in 2025

For searches like Rogue 2020 movie review, Megan Fox action movie, or Rogue lion thriller, Rogue remains a curiosity for B-movie fans. Keywords like Megan Fox mercenary, Rogue 2020 trailer, and action horror hybrid drive interest, reflecting its niche appeal. The film’s streaming availability on platforms like Amazon and its physical sales keep it relevant for casual viewers.

Rogue taps into 2020s trends of diverse casts and female-led action, though it falls short of films like Mad Max: Fury Road or Atomic Blonde. Its failures—bad CGI, weak writing—are a case study in B-movie pitfalls, while its ambition resonates with fans of The Expendables or Beast (2022). X posts from 2020, like IGN’s trailer hype, show initial excitement, but Reddit’s skepticism persists.

Conclusion: A B-Movie with Untapped Potential

Rogue is a flawed but ambitious action thriller that bites off more than it can chew. Megan Fox’s casting draws attention but doesn’t fully convince, while M.J. Bᴀssett’s direction is hampered by budget constraints and a weak script. The South African setting and diverse cast are highlights, but poor CGI and uneven pacing hold it back. For B-movie enthusiasts, it’s a pᴀssable “popcorn flick,” but others may find it forgettable.

Stream Rogue on Amazon or grab the Blu-ray for a rainy-day watch, but temper expectations. For more, check Lionsgate’s YouTube channel or join the debate on X.

FAQs

When was Rogue released?
August 28, 2020, digitally, and September 1, 2020, on Blu-ray/DVD.

Who stars in Rogue?
Megan Fox, Philip Winchester, Jessica Sutton, Calli Taylor, and Adam Deacon.

Is Rogue worth watching?
It’s a fun, flawed B-movie for action fans, but poor CGI and writing may disappoint.

Why was Megan Fox criticized?
Many felt she was miscast as a mercenary, with a polished look and monotone delivery.

​

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.