📍 Discovery Site:

• Location: Charama, Kanker District (Chhattisgarh), near Hoshangabad (Madhya Pradesh)

• Age: Estimated 10,000 years old (Mesolithic period)

• Preservation: Natural mineral pigments (ochre, charcoal) kept the artwork remarkably intact.

🛸 Key Findings: UFOs, “Spacewear,” and Celestial Beings

1. Disk-Shaped Objects & Wormholes

   • Clear depictions of flying saucers with dome tops and radiating lights.

   • One painting shows a spiral portal (resembling a wormhole or stargate) with beings emerging.

2. Humanoid Figures in Advanced Attire

   • Large-headed beings wearing helmets, antennae, and form-fitting suits.

   • Some appear to float mid-air or interact with humans.

3. The “Rohela People” Legend

   • Tribal oral history describes celestial visitors (“Rohela”) who shared knowledge before vanishing.

   • Parallels to Vedic texts (e.g., Ramayana’s “Vimanas” – ancient flying machines).

📅 The “Alien Calendar” Controversy

• A sequence of symbols suggests future visitations, possibly correlating to:

  • 2030: A “return” event.

  • 2046: A celestial alignment or contact.

• Researchers caution that dating is speculative—could represent mythic cycles rather than prophecies.

🌍 Global Connections

• Similar Art Worldwide:

  • Val Camonica, Italy: 8,000-year-old “astronaut” carvings.

  • Kimberley, Australia: Wandjina spirits (sky beings with haloed heads).

• Ancient Astronaut Theory:

  • Do these paintings record real encounters with advanced beings?

  • Did extraterrestrials influence early tech (e.g., Vimana lore)?

🔬 Scientific Response

• Skeptics argue the “UFOs” could be shamanic visions or symbolic representations of sun/moon deities.

• Proponents note the precision of the craft designs, unlike any natural phenomena.

📜 Tribal Myths vs. Modern Science

• The Gondi and Bhil tribes have pᴀssed down Rohela stories for generations.

• Vedic parallels: The Mahabharata describes “sky chariots” and battles involving advanced weapons.

🚀 Implications

If verified, these paintings could:

• Challenge mainstream archaeology’s timeline of human development.

• Support the theory that ancient civilizations had contact with non-human intelligence.