🎬 Operation Red Sea 2, also known as Operation Hadal, storms into theaters February 28, 2025, building on the $579 million success of 2018’s Operation Red Sea. Directed by Dante Lam, this Chinese action-war flick shifts from the original’s desert chaos to a maritime showdown, with the Jiaolong ᴀssault Team facing mercenaries who’ve seized the Deep Blue 3 offshore platform in Chinese waters. Starring Xuan Huang (Extraordinary Mission), Yosh Yu (Born to Fly), and Zhang Hanyu (Manhunt), it could open with a helicopter ᴀssault on the rig—waves crashing, guns blazing—echoing Lam’s knack for explosive starts seen in Operation Mekong (2016).

The narrative might pivot from the first film’s Yemen-inspired rescue to a high-seas siege, per MyDramaList’s synopsis of a post-civil-war Ivia plunged back into terror by an M-country-backed conspiracy. The Jiaolong squad—possibly led again by a steely Yang Rui type—could infiltrate the rig, battling rogue ex-soldiers and submarine threats, with a mid-film twist revealing a traitor within China’s navy. The climax might feature a submarine chase and rig detonation, though risks loom of repeating Red Sea’s relentless action over plot depth, a critique from its 6.6/10 IMDb score.

Thematically, it could explore sovereignty and sacrifice—China’s naval might flexing against foreign meddling, a patriotic thread Lam’s woven since Red Sea’s 90th PLA anniversary nod. The team’s losses, a staple of Lam’s brutal realism (think Red Sea’s sniper deaths), might underscore duty’s cost, though X posts flag concerns of jingoism overload—“more flag-waving than Bay,” one quips. Unlike Wolf Warrior’s invincibility, Lam keeps his heroes fallible, losing early fights per IMDb reviews, a restraint that could ground the bombast if balanced right.

Visually, expect Lam’s signature chaos—ocean swells and rig explosions sH๏τ with the visceral flair of Red Sea’s $70 million budget, likely scaled to $100 million here (speculative, based on rising Chinese film costs). Cityonfire.com teases “vehicular chaos, unlimited bullets, and military hardware galore,” with submarine battles rivaling Das Boot’s tension, per IMDb user hype. The score, possibly by Chan Kwong-wing again, could pulse with industrial beats, though CGI hellhounds or subs might falter if not paired with Fury Road-level practical stunts.

Casting taps Huang’s stoic grit, Yu’s fresh intensity, and Hanyu’s veteran heft, with Jiang Luxia (Double World) possibly as a fierce commando—her martial arts teased in Well Go USA’s January 2025 promo. New faces like Karry Wang and Yihong Duan join, but the focus stays on the squad, not bloated cameos. X buzz praises Lam’s “non-stop action choreography,” though some dread shallow characters—Red Sea’s 2-hour-22-minute runtime left little room for depth. Chemistry hinges on the team’s underdog vibe, a Lam hallmark.

Ultimately, Operation Red Sea 2 (2025) aims to top Red Sea’s eleventh-highest Chinese gross with a $600 million global haul, riding Lam’s rep and a leaner 2-hour-26-minute cut (IMDb). Well Go USA’s U.S. push post-Red Sea’s $1.5 million stateside flop signals faith, but X splits on hype—“best sub flick since Hunter Killer” versus “more of the same.” It could be a naval triumph if Lam nails the action-story balance, or a loud retread if it drowns in patriotism. February 28 will test if this Hadal dives deep or just treads water.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

Hoxne Hoard treasures. Photo by Helen Simonsson CC by SA-2.0

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

Hoxne Village. Photo by Duncan Grey CC BY-SA 2.0

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

Hoxne Hoard: Display case at the British Museum showing a reconstruction of the arrangement of the hoard treasure when excavated in 1992. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Hoxne Hoard: Coins. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

The silver “Hoxne Tigress” – the broken-off handle from an unknown object – is the best known single piece out of some 15,000 in the hoard. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

A silver-gilt spoon with a marine beast from the Hoxne Hoard. Currently in the British Museum. Photo by JMiall CC BY-SA 3.0

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Reconstruction of the Hoxne treasure chest. Photo by Mike Peel CC-BY-SA-4.0

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

Two gold bracelets from the Hoxne Hoard, in the British Museum. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Three silver-gilt Roman piperatoria or pepper pots from the Hoxne Hoard on display at the British Museum

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

Two toiletry items, one in the shape of a crane-like bird; the other with an empty socket, probably for bristles for a makeup brush. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.