Review: “Henry Danger: The Movie” (2025) – The Return of a Nickelodeon Icon

“Henry Danger: The Movie” (2025) marks the much-anticipated return of Nickelodeon’s hit series, delivering a fresh, action-packed storyline, beloved characters, and exciting new adventures. The film is not only a treat for long-time fans but also offers an entertaining experience for newcomers.

Plot Summary

After leaving Swellview and his role as Kid Danger, Henry Hart (Jace Norman) has fully embraced his new idenтιтy as an independent superhero in the bustling city of Dystopia. With fame and new responsibilities, Henry enjoys his life as a true protector. However, everything changes when Missy Martin (Glee Dango), an enthusiastic Kid Danger superfan, accidentally acquires a Reality-Altering Device (R.A.D.).

As Missy experiments with the device, she unintentionally pulls Henry into a multiverse adventure, where they encounter alternate versions of themselves and face unexpected challenges. Alongside Jasper (Sean Ryan Fox), who in one alternate reality goes by the alias “Captain Stache,” Henry must find a way back to his own dimension before getting permanently trapped in another world.

But with the multiverse constantly shifting and new villains emerging, can Henry regain control and return home in time?

Character Development & Performances

Jace Norman once again proves why he is the heart and soul of the Henry Danger franchise. In this feature-length film, his character, Henry Hart, is more than just a sidekick—he’s a full-fledged superhero grappling with idenтιтy and responsibility. Jace delivers a strong performance, portraying Henry’s transition from a fun-loving teenager to a mature hero with emotional depth.

Glee Dango brings fresh energy to the film as Missy Martin, a pᴀssionate fan who dreams of being a hero herself. Her character arc is not only comedic but also thought-provoking, showing how admiration can turn into an opportunity for personal growth.

Sean Ryan Fox, reprising his role as Jasper, provides the film’s signature humor but also gets an expanded role as an alternate version of himself, “Captain Stache.” His character is more than just comic relief; he serves as a crucial ally to Henry, emphasizing the power of friendship even across different realities.

Visual Effects & Cinematography

One of the standout elements of Henry Danger: The Movie is its impressive visual effects. The film successfully brings the concept of the multiverse to life with uniquely designed alternate realities, each with its own distinctive atmosphere. The action sequences are well-executed, balancing intensity with the lighthearted humor that defines the franchise.

The cinematography enhances the storytelling by using dynamic camera angles, especially during dimension-hopping sequences. The color grading also shifts to distinguish different realities, ensuring that the audience can clearly follow the ever-changing environments without confusion.

Themes & Narrative Arcs

Beyond its entertaining action and comedy, Henry Danger: The Movie explores deeper themes of idenтιтy, responsibility, and heroism. Henry’s journey through alternate dimensions serves as a metaphor for self-discovery, forcing him to confront different versions of himself and question what truly defines a hero.

Missy Martin’s storyline reflects the impact of fandom, illustrating both its positive and negative aspects. Her character arc highlights the idea that being a hero isn’t just about admiration but about making real sacrifices and taking action.

The film also emphasizes friendship, as Henry and Jasper—despite being from different realities—must work together to overcome obstacles. Their dynamic showcases the importance of trust and camaraderie, reinforcing that true friendship transcends time and space.

Audience Reception

The film has received mixed reactions from audiences. Many long-time fans were thrilled to see Henry Danger back on screen, with some expressing excitement over Captain Man’s cameo. Some even described the moment as more exciting than recent Hollywood blockbusters.

Others praised the film for its emotional moments, saying that it exceeded their expectations by providing a heartfelt conclusion. The cliffhanger ending also left many speculating about future Henry Danger-related content.

However, not all reviews were positive. Some viewers criticized the film’s writing, citing occasional weak dialogue and pacing issues. Others felt that, while the film had an engaging concept, it still resembled an extended TV episode rather than a fully cinematic experience.

Critical Reviews

Critics have shared varied opinions on Henry Danger: The Movie. Some praised its ability to retain the charm of the original series while expanding its narrative to a larger scope. They appreciated its self-awareness, fun execution of the multiverse concept, and emotional depth.

However, some reviews pointed out its flaws, such as occasional inconsistencies in the plot and the underutilization of certain characters. Others felt that the film, while enjoyable, did not push the franchise to its full cinematic potential.

Despite these critiques, Henry Danger: The Movie has succeeded in reigniting enthusiasm for the series, proving that there is still a dedicated fanbase eager for more adventures.

Conclusion

“Henry Danger: The Movie” is not just an action-comedy for kids—it’s a love letter to the fans who have followed Henry Hart’s journey over the years. With visually stunning sequences, a compelling storyline, and a strong cast, the film successfully delivers an exciting new chapter for the Henry Danger universe.

While it may not be flawless in terms of execution, it remains a fun and nostalgic ride that offers both humor and heartfelt moments. And with its open-ended finale, this may not be the last time we see Kid Danger on the big screen.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.