Inferno (1999) – A Gritty Action Thriller Starring Jean-Claude Van Damme

Introduction

Released on September 25, 1999, Inferno (also known as Desert Heat) is an action-packed thriller starring Jean-Claude Van Damme. Directed by John G. Avildsen, known for his work on Rocky (1976) and The Karate Kid series, this film blends elements of Westerns, revenge thrillers, and martial arts action. While Inferno never reached blockbuster status, it has since gained a cult following among Van Damme enthusiasts and action movie fans.

With its blend of gritty action, intense fight sequences, and a lone-wolf revenge story, Inferno fits squarely into the 90s action movie mold. In this review, we will analyze its plot, performances, action choreography, and legacy to determine if it holds up as an underrated classic.

Plot Summary

Jean-Claude Van Damme stars as Eddie Lomax, a troubled former soldier who wanders into a small desert town, seeking redemption—or perhaps an end to his suffering. Just as he contemplates taking his own life, he is brutally attacked and left for ᴅᴇᴀᴅ by a ruthless gang that terrorizes the town. However, instead of dying, Eddie is rescued by an old Native American man who helps him recover.

Fueled by a thirst for justice, Eddie embarks on a revenge-fueled rampage, dismantling the criminal gang piece by piece. Along the way, he uncovers corruption, finds unlikely allies, and rekindles his sense of purpose. What begins as a suicidal mission soon turns into a fight for redemption and justice for the town’s oppressed citizens.

The storyline is simple but effective, echoing classic Western revenge tales like A Fistful of Dollars and High Plains Drifter, combined with Van Damme’s signature martial arts prowess.

Cast and Performances

Jean-Claude Van Damme as Eddie Lomax

Van Damme delivers a solid performance as the rugged, world-weary protagonist. While his character is more reserved compared to his other roles, he effectively conveys both Eddie’s pain and his transformation into an avenger.

Danny Trejo as Johnny Six Toes

Trejo plays the wise Native American who saves Eddie and gives him a reason to fight. Though a supporting role, Trejo adds depth and gravitas to the film.

Pat Morita as Jubal Early

Known for his iconic role as Mr. Miyagi in The Karate Kid, Morita provides comic relief and a sense of wisdom as a quirky bar owner who ᴀssists Eddie.

Larry Drake as Ramsey

Drake plays the main antagonist, a sadistic gang leader who thrives on cruelty. While his role is somewhat cliché, his presence makes for a solid villain.

Supporting Cast

• Jaime Pressly as Dottie Matthews – The film’s love interest who becomes entangled in the chaos.
• Vincent Schiavelli as Ely – Another eccentric townsperson who adds to the Western setting.

Overall, the performances are solid for an action film of this nature, with Van Damme’s brooding intensity carrying much of the film.

Action and Choreography

As expected from a Van Damme movie, Inferno features well-executed fight sequences that blend traditional martial arts with brutal hand-to-hand combat. Notable action highlights include:

• A bar brawl scene where Eddie takes down multiple goons with his signature kicks and fast-paced choreography.
• A motorcycle chase through the desert that provides high-speed thrills.
• A climactic showdown with the gang leader, filled with tension and well-choreographed fight moves.

Unlike some of Van Damme’s more polished martial arts films, Inferno takes a grittier, more realistic approach to combat, making it feel raw and intense. The film also features traditional gunfights and explosions, enhancing its Western-inspired feel.

Themes and Tone

1. Redemption and Revenge

Eddie starts the film as a broken man, but his fight for justice helps him find purpose again. This theme of redemption is common in action movies, but Inferno handles it well.

2. The Lone Warrior

Much like Clint Eastwood’s characters in classic Westerns, Eddie is a drifter who arrives in a corrupt town, takes down the bad guys, and leaves with a newfound sense of purpose.

3. Honor and Justice

Through Johnny Six Toes and the town’s inhabitants, the film explores the idea of fighting for justice, even in the face of overwhelming corruption.

While Inferno doesn’t introduce groundbreaking themes, it executes them effectively within the framework of a straightforward revenge story.

Reception and Legacy

Box Office Performance

Inferno was a direct-to-video release in many countries, which limited its mainstream appeal. However, it found an audience among Van Damme fans who appreciated its mix of Western and action elements.

Critical and Audience Reception

• Rotten Tomatoes Score: N/A (not widely reviewed by critics)
• IMDB Rating: 5.2/10
• Audience Response: Fans of Van Damme appreciate its action sequences, but some criticize its predictable story and slower pacing.

Cult Following

Over the years, Inferno has become a cult favorite among Van Damme enthusiasts. While it may not rank among his best-known works (Bloodsport, Kickboxer), it offers a unique blend of action and Western aesthetics.

Final Verdict

Pros:

✅ Jean-Claude Van Damme delivers a compelling, brooding performance ✅ Well-choreographed fight scenes with a mix of martial arts and gritty combat ✅ Western revenge plot adds a unique twist to the action genre ✅ Strong supporting performances from Danny Trejo and Pat Morita ✅ Fun blend of action, humor, and old-school justice

Cons:

❌ Predictable story that follows standard revenge film tropes ❌ Slower pacing compared to high-octane Van Damme classics ❌ Some characters lack depth and feel underdeveloped

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐☆ (3.5/5)

While Inferno (1999) may not be Jean-Claude Van Damme’s best film, it remains a solid action flick that delivers satisfying fight sequences and a compelling lone-wolf revenge story. Fans of Western-style action films and Van Damme’s work will find plenty to enjoy, making it worth a watch for those seeking a gritty, action-packed thriller.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain

---

November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.

The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.

When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”

Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.

Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.

Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”

Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.

That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.

Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.

All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.