In the Name of the Father (1993)

In the Name of the Father (1993) is a powerful biographical crime drama directed by Jim Sheridan. The film is based on the true story of the Guildford Four, four innocent individuals who were wrongfully convicted of bombing a pub in Guildford, England, in 1974. The bombing resulted in the deaths of four British soldiers and one civilian. The movie explores themes of justice, corruption, and the emotional toll of wrongful imprisonment, offering a stark and gripping portrayal of the flawed legal system.

The film follows the life of Gerry Conlon, played by Daniel Day-Lewis, who, along with his father Giuseppe (played by Pete Postlethwaite), is falsely accused of the Guildford pub bombing. The story details Gerry’s journey from being a young man with a troubled past to a wrongfully convicted prisoner. The film takes the audience through his arduous battle to prove his innocence, as he and his family face immense hardship in their fight against a corrupt justice system. The dramatic narrative shows how the personal and emotional aspects of their lives intertwine with the political and social issues of the time.

At the heart of the film is Gerry Conlon, whose transformation from a naive young man to a determined and courageous individual is portrayed in an award-winning performance by Daniel Day-Lewis. Gerry’s father, Giuseppe, is a man of integrity and resilience, and his relationship with Gerry forms the emotional core of the story. The film also introduces several other key figures, including the lawyers and activists who play a role in the eventual exoneration of the Guildford Four. The development of these characters highlights themes of family loyalty, justice, and perseverance.


In the Name of the Father delves deeply into the injustices of the British legal system, particularly in the context of the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The film explores the themes of wrongful conviction, police brutality, and political manipulation. Through the story of the Guildford Four, it underscores the devastating consequences of systemic failure and the human cost of insтιтutional corruption. The film also highlights the importance of fighting for justice and the bond between family members who endure unimaginable hardships together.


Jim Sheridan’s direction brings a raw and visceral quality to In the Name of the Father. The film’s cinematography, by Peter Biziou, uses a muted color palette and stark, realistic lighting to convey the grim and oppressive atmosphere of the prison and the trials faced by the Conlon family. The tense, emotionally charged scenes are complemented by subtle but effective camera work that focuses on the inner turmoil of the characters. Sheridan’s masterful storytelling captures the emotional weight of the real-life events, making the film both a personal and politically charged narrative.


In conclusion, In the Name of the Father is a haunting and thought-provoking film that sheds light on a tragic chapter in British history. With stellar performances, particularly from Daniel Day-Lewis and Pete Postlethwaite, and a compelling, true-to-life story, the film is a poignant reminder of the importance of justice and the human cost of wrongful convictions. Jim Sheridan’s direction and the film’s powerful themes make it a memorable and impactful cinematic experience that challenges viewers to question the integrity of insтιтutions meant to protect the innocent. In the Name of the Father is a profound tribute to the resilience of the human spirit in the face of grave injustice.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain


Hoxne Hoard treasures. Photo by Helen Simonsson CC by SA-2.0
November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.
Hoxne Village. Photo by Duncan Grey CC BY-SA 2.0
Hoxne Village. Photo by Duncan Grey CC BY-SA 2.0
The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.
Hoxne Hoard: Display case at the British Museum showing a reconstruction of the arrangement of the hoard treasure when excavated in 1992. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Hoxne Hoard: Display case at the British Museum showing a reconstruction of the arrangement of the hoard treasure when excavated in 1992. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”
Hoxne Hoard: Coins. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Hoxne Hoard: Coins. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.
The silver “Hoxne Tigress” – the broken-off handle from an unknown object – is the best known single piece out of some 15,000 in the hoard. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
The silver “Hoxne Tigress” – the broken-off handle from an unknown object – is the best known single piece out of some 15,000 in the hoard. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.
A silver-gilt spoon with a marine beast from the Hoxne Hoard. Currently in the British Museum. Photo by JMiall CC BY-SA 3.0
A silver-gilt spoon with a marine beast from the Hoxne Hoard. Currently in the British Museum. Photo by JMiall CC BY-SA 3.0
Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”
Reconstruction of the Hoxne treasure chest. Photo by Mike Peel CC-BY-SA-4.0
Reconstruction of the Hoxne treasure chest. Photo by Mike Peel CC-BY-SA-4.0
Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.
Two gold bracelets from the Hoxne Hoard, in the British Museum. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
Two gold bracelets from the Hoxne Hoard, in the British Museum. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.
Three silver-gilt Roman piperatoria or pepper pots from the Hoxne Hoard on display at the British Museum
Three silver-gilt Roman piperatoria or pepper pots from the Hoxne Hoard on display at the British Museum
Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.
Two toiletry items, one in the shape of a crane-like bird; the other with an empty socket, probably for bristles for a makeup brush. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
Two toiletry items, one in the shape of a crane-like bird; the other with an empty socket, probably for bristles for a makeup brush. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.

Related Posts

Women in Ancient Egypt

Women in ancient Egypt were regarded as the equals of men in every aspect save that of occupation. The man was the head of the household and nation, but women…

I Can’t Think Straight (2008)

I Can’t Think Straight is a romantic drama directed by Shamim Sarif, focusing on the unexpected love story between Tala, a Christian woman from a wealthy Jordanian…

INVINCIBLE (2025) | Henry Cavill, Timothée Chalamet

INVINCIBLE (2025) is an ambitious live-action adaptation of the popular comic series, starring Henry Cavill as Omni-Man and Timothée Chalamet as Mark Grayson (Invincible). The film follows Mark Grayson, an ordinary teenager who…

After additional data about extraterrestrial infiltration is found, the enigma surrounding the Arctic deepens.

Α frᴇsh wavᴇ of iпtrigυᴇ has ᴇпvᴇlopᴇd thᴇ sciᴇпtific commυпity followiпg thᴇ discovᴇry of пᴇw data hiпtiпg at possiblᴇ aliᴇп iпfiltratioп iп thᴇ Αrctic. Thᴇ mystᴇrioυs iпformatioп,…

Shadow and Bone (2024)

Shadow and Bone is a fantasy television series created by Eric Heisserer for Netflix, based on the Grishaverse novels by Leigh Bardugo. The series stars Jessie Mei…

Righteous Kill 2008

Righteous Kill is a 2008 crime thriller directed by Jon Avnet. The film stars Robert De Niro and Al Pacino as Turk and Rooster, two veteran New…