Love Lies Bleeding

Love Lies Bleeding, a lurid 80s-set thriller premiering at Sundance, is the kind of eager, balls-to-the-wall midnight movie that hopes to keep you awake by cattle-prodding you with shocks, peppering formulaic neo-noir with enough Big Moments to curb any post-beer sleepiness. The raucous response it was met with over the weekend suggests that it might have done the trick for many, but such reliance can be exhausting rather than exhilarating. Without the attention-grabbing, X-rated theatrics, it’s ultimately just a film we’ve seen too many times before, struggling to justify why we’re seeing it again.

Love Lies Bleeding review – gore, Sєx and 80s needle-drops can't save  forgettable thriller | Sundance 2024 | The Guardian

Director Rose Glᴀss’s 2020 breakout, low-budget horror Saint Maud quickly developed an impᴀssioned following, heralded as the arrival of a new genre visionary. I appreciated it more as proof of a first-time film-maker’s undeniable visual ability than anything else, gussying up an otherwise ho-hum retread of well-trodden territory.

Glᴀss again proves herself to be a skilled mood-setter, her bigger, brasher follow-up transplanting her aesthetic from Scarborough to New Mexico, but her story-telling remains less punchy, partnering with Weronika Tofilska to tell a theoretically new, yet decidedly old, story.

We’re in familiar small-town crime territory. Tragic lovers sinking into a murk of violence, with the major distinguisher being their gender, two women giving a queer female spin to a subgenre usually dominated by men. But other than some eye-opening Sєx scenes, their Sєxuality and gender does very little to differentiate an age-old story, any original detail or observation buried in a mess of cliches.

Love Lies Bleeding' Review: Kristen Stewart, Crazy (and Scary) in Love -  The New York Times

Kristen Stewart, already having a rocky festival with misfiring sci-fi romance Love Me, plays withdrawn gym manager Lou, who is living a grimy, lonely life that receives a flash of neon when ambitious bodybuilder Jackie, played by Katy O’Brian, comes into town. The two fall fast, their own version of domestic bliss involving egg white omelettes, steroids and a lot of Sєx, but the curse of Lou’s family starts to creep its way in. Her sister (Jena Malone) is stuck in an abusive marriage with an odious womaniser (Dave Franco) who works for her equally vile criminal father (Ed Harris), and Lou and Jackie’s plan for the future starts to curdle as they get sucked into a squalid vortex of murder.

The descent from bad to worse is as aesthetically alluring as it was in Saint Maud. Glᴀss uses roid rage as an effectively gnarly form of body horror (recalling last year’s yet-to-be-released Sundance drama Magazine Dreams), but it’s all dramatically un-involving, kicked off by a confusingly justified Bad Decision and then hampered by a ᴅᴇᴀᴅening disinterest in suspense.

Love Lies Bleeding review – Kristen Stewart keeps it real in deliciously  lurid outlaw romance | Movies | The Guardian

The escalation that these stories usually employ, as the net closes in and the tensions fray, is crucially mishandled, and our investment in the central couple – both criminally underwritten – vanishes by the minute with just noise and nastiness to fill the empty void at its centre. There’s very little here from Stewart that we haven’t seen from her before and it’s only in the brief bursts of Anna Baryshnikov, stealing scenes as an excitable gossip, that any real fun can be had.

Glᴀss forces some big, silly swings in the last act, the biggest of which is quite literally too big, but it all feels like desperate distraction, empty provocation upon empty provocation, destined to get people talking but unlikely to have them remembering any of it for longer than the journey home. Without the garish excess, the script is rote and rickety, a ride to the wild side that’s all out of gas.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain


Hoxne Hoard treasures. Photo by Helen Simonsson CC by SA-2.0
November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.
Hoxne Village. Photo by Duncan Grey CC BY-SA 2.0
Hoxne Village. Photo by Duncan Grey CC BY-SA 2.0
The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.
Hoxne Hoard: Display case at the British Museum showing a reconstruction of the arrangement of the hoard treasure when excavated in 1992. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Hoxne Hoard: Display case at the British Museum showing a reconstruction of the arrangement of the hoard treasure when excavated in 1992. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”
Hoxne Hoard: Coins. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Hoxne Hoard: Coins. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.
The silver “Hoxne Tigress” – the broken-off handle from an unknown object – is the best known single piece out of some 15,000 in the hoard. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
The silver “Hoxne Tigress” – the broken-off handle from an unknown object – is the best known single piece out of some 15,000 in the hoard. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.
A silver-gilt spoon with a marine beast from the Hoxne Hoard. Currently in the British Museum. Photo by JMiall CC BY-SA 3.0
A silver-gilt spoon with a marine beast from the Hoxne Hoard. Currently in the British Museum. Photo by JMiall CC BY-SA 3.0
Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”
Reconstruction of the Hoxne treasure chest. Photo by Mike Peel CC-BY-SA-4.0
Reconstruction of the Hoxne treasure chest. Photo by Mike Peel CC-BY-SA-4.0
Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.
Two gold bracelets from the Hoxne Hoard, in the British Museum. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
Two gold bracelets from the Hoxne Hoard, in the British Museum. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.
Three silver-gilt Roman piperatoria or pepper pots from the Hoxne Hoard on display at the British Museum
Three silver-gilt Roman piperatoria or pepper pots from the Hoxne Hoard on display at the British Museum
Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.
Two toiletry items, one in the shape of a crane-like bird; the other with an empty socket, probably for bristles for a makeup brush. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
Two toiletry items, one in the shape of a crane-like bird; the other with an empty socket, probably for bristles for a makeup brush. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.

Related Posts

The Anunnaki (2025)

Get ready for a mind-bending adventure in The Return of the Anunnaki, a thrilling sci-fi epic that explores humanity’s ancient origins and its potential future. The Anunnaki,…

An underrated romance: Lady Chatterley’s Lover 2022

A story well ahead of its time, We follow the life of Lady Chatterley, a woman born to a life of wealth and privilege, who soon finds…

L’Amant (1992)

L’Amant (1992), also known as The Lover, is a French film directed by Jean-Jacques Annaud, adapted from the novel L’Amant by Marguerite Duras. The film is set…

Liebe und Verlangen (Love and Desire) (2019)

Liebe und Verlangen (Love and Desire) is a 2003 German television film that explores themes of love, desire, and societal expectations. The story centers around Karen, the…

Screen Gems reflects on The Dreamers (2003)

Michael Pitt is so memorable in this Bertolucci cinematic “delight”! The Dreamers is a romantic drama directed by the legendary Bernardo Bertolucci. The screenplay is by Gilbert…

Jamie and Jessie Are Not Together (2011)

Jamie and Jessie Are Not Together (2011) is a romantic dramedy about two best friends, Jamie and Jessie, whose close bond is complicated by unspoken feelings. Jamie…