Young Guns (1988)

“Young Guns” (1988) is an American Western action film directed and produced by Christopher Cain, with a screenplay written by John Fusco. The film dramatizes the adventures of Billy the Kid during the Lincoln County War in New Mexico in 1877-78. With a young and talented cast, including Emilio Estevez, Charlie Sheen, and Kiefer Sutherland, “Young Guns” provides a thrilling and action-packed retelling of a turbulent period in American history.

The plot of “Young Guns” follows the story of a group of young gunmen, led by Billy the Kid (Emilio Estevez), who are hired to protect a wealthy businessman, John Tunstall (Terrence Stamp). When Tunstall is murdered by a rival landowner, the group takes up arms against the corrupt officials and lawmen of the region, becoming embroiled in the brutal conflict known as the Lincoln County War. The film focuses on Billy the Kid’s transformation from a naïve young man into a notorious outlaw, all while navigating the dangers and moral complexities of the war.

One of the central themes of “Young Guns” is the exploration of loyalty and friendship. Billy the Kid’s relationship with his fellow gunmen, including Doc Scurlock (Kiefer Sutherland) and Chavez (Lou Diamond Phillips), is vital to the film’s emotional core. Despite their different backgrounds and personalities, the group shares a strong bond, and their loyalty to one another is tested as they face constant danger. This camaraderie is a driving force throughout the film, with the characters supporting each other even as the conflict becomes more violent and unforgiving.

The film also portrays the consequences of violence and the harsh realities of life in the Old West. As Billy and his companions continue to fight in the Lincoln County War, they are confronted with the moral ambiguities of their actions. While they seek justice for the murder of their employer, they also become increasingly entangled in a cycle of violence that is difficult to escape. The movie emphasizes how the characters struggle with their own choices, showing that the line between right and wrong is often blurred in times of war.

Emilio Estevez’s portrayal of Billy the Kid is a standout performance in the film. Estevez brings a sense of vulnerability and rebellious energy to the character, making Billy the Kid both charismatic and tragic. The supporting cast, including Charlie Sheen as the stoic and loyal Doc Scurlock and Kiefer Sutherland as the quick-tempered Jack, complements Estevez’s performance, creating a dynamic and memorable group of characters. The chemistry between the actors adds depth to the film, making their interactions believable and engaging.

Christopher Cain’s direction ensures that “Young Guns” is packed with action and suspense. The film’s pacing keeps the audience engaged, with plenty of thrilling gunfights and high-stakes moments. The cinematography captures the vast, rugged landscapes of New Mexico, immersing viewers in the harsh environment of the Old West. The film’s score further enhances the atmosphere, underscoring the tension and drama of the characters’ journey.

In conclusion, “Young Guns” is an exciting and action-filled Western that provides a fresh take on the story of Billy the Kid and the Lincoln County War. Through strong performances, particularly from Emilio Estevez, and a well-crafted script, the film brings the brutal realities of the Old West to life. The themes of loyalty, friendship, and the consequences of violence resonate throughout the film, making it not just an action movie, but a thoughtful exploration of morality and survival. “Young Guns” remains a beloved entry in the Western genre, offering both thrilling action and emotional depth.

A Farmer’s Misplaced Hammer Led to the Largest Roman Treasure in Britain


Hoxne Hoard treasures. Photo by Helen Simonsson CC by SA-2.0
November 16, 1992 was the day which changed Suffolk-resident Eric Lawes’ life in a huge way. What he thought would have been an innocent search for a hammer he had misplaced on his farm in Hoxne Village, Suffolk, England ended up bringing him much more than he had bargained for — namely, uncovering the hiding spot of a long-hidden treasure. Based on the Guardian’s coverage of the story, Eric Lawes had been previously gifted a metal detector upon his retirement as a parting token. He decided to put his retirement gift to good use in order to locate the hammer which he had had some trouble finding. According to a 2018 Smithsonian Magazine article, when the device started recording that there was a strong signal coming from the earth, he knew that he was about to discover something big. As he started digging, it soon became clear to him that he had unearthed a treasure trove.
Hoxne Village. Photo by Duncan Grey CC BY-SA 2.0
Hoxne Village. Photo by Duncan Grey CC BY-SA 2.0
The Guardian reports that, when Lawes saw that his preliminary digging had yielded a few gold coins and silver spoons, he immediately contacted both the local archaeological society and the police department. Archaeologists came to the property the following day and had the area of earth holding the treasure carefully sectioned-off and removed. Their hope was that at a later stage, in their laboratory, they could examined the items in order to identify both their age and how they were stored.
Hoxne Hoard: Display case at the British Museum showing a reconstruction of the arrangement of the hoard treasure when excavated in 1992. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Hoxne Hoard: Display case at the British Museum showing a reconstruction of the arrangement of the hoard treasure when excavated in 1992. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
When all was said and done, close to 60 pounds of items made from silver and gold were found on the site. These included more than 15,000 Roman coins, 200 gold objects, and several silver spoons. For archaeologists, this find — which later became labeled as the Hoxne Hoard — was an incredible discovery. AP News reported that archaeologist Judith Plouviez was over-the-moon about the discovery, saying that it was “an incredibly exciting and amazing find.” What’s more, another archaeologist, Rachel Wilkinson, told Smithsonian Magazine that this discovery was “the largest and latest ever found in Britain.”
Hoxne Hoard: Coins. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Hoxne Hoard: Coins. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Ordinarily, archaeologists would use radiocarbon dating as a means of identifying the age of ancient relics. However, they couldn’t locate any suitable material from the haul. Consequently, they determined the age by examining writing on the coins, as well as the ruler carved into them, estimating that the treasure was probably buried in either 408 or 409 AD.
The silver “Hoxne Tigress” – the broken-off handle from an unknown object – is the best known single piece out of some 15,000 in the hoard. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
The silver “Hoxne Tigress” – the broken-off handle from an unknown object – is the best known single piece out of some 15,000 in the hoard. Photo by Mike Peel CC BY-SA 4.0
Roman-era archaeologist Peter Guest told Smithsonian Magazine that “if you look at them a little more carefully, then they should be dated to the period after the separation of Britain from the Roman Empire.” He offers as part of his evidence the fact that almost all of the coins found in the Hoxne Hoard were clipped – in other words, small chunks of their edges had been taken off. These clippings would have been used to create coins which were similar to the Roman coins of that era.
A silver-gilt spoon with a marine beast from the Hoxne Hoard. Currently in the British Museum. Photo by JMiall CC BY-SA 3.0
A silver-gilt spoon with a marine beast from the Hoxne Hoard. Currently in the British Museum. Photo by JMiall CC BY-SA 3.0
Guest has a logical reason for this, arguing that “The Roman Empire wasn’t supplying Britain with new gold and silver coins, and in light of that, the population tried to get over this sudden cutoff in the supply of their precious metals by making the existing supplies go further.”
Reconstruction of the Hoxne treasure chest. Photo by Mike Peel CC-BY-SA-4.0
Reconstruction of the Hoxne treasure chest. Photo by Mike Peel CC-BY-SA-4.0
Archaeologists also believe that the treasure belonged to a Romano-British family. During that time, considering that there was so much societal discord and upheaval, it was common for Romans who had settled in Britain to bury their most prized possessions.
Two gold bracelets from the Hoxne Hoard, in the British Museum. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
Two gold bracelets from the Hoxne Hoard, in the British Museum. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
That said, one archaeologist is of the belief that the hoard had a lot of sentimental value for the Romano-British family to whom it is believed to have belonged. In her book The Hoxne Late Roman Treasure: Gold Jewellery and Silver Plate, Catherine Johns claims that the manner in which the treasure was kept supported this claim. Some of the items which were recovered had been packaged in small, wooden boxes which were lined with leather. What’s more, pieces of wood, locks, and nails, among other things, surrounded the gold and silver pieces. This leads Catherine to assert that the package was carefully buried and not simply chucked away in a rush.
Three silver-gilt Roman piperatoria or pepper pots from the Hoxne Hoard on display at the British Museum
Three silver-gilt Roman piperatoria or pepper pots from the Hoxne Hoard on display at the British Museum
Interestingly enough, the items unearthed might shed some light on the identity of the family who owned them. They cite a gold bracelet bearing the inscription “UTERE FELIX DOMINA IULIANE,” which roughly translates to “use this happily Lady Juliane”. A second name “Aurelius Ursicinus” has also been discovered. This has consequently led some to believe that Juliane and Aurelius were the couple and the original owners of the treasure. That said, that has yet to be confirmed.
Two toiletry items, one in the shape of a crane-like bird; the other with an empty socket, probably for bristles for a makeup brush. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
Two toiletry items, one in the shape of a crane-like bird; the other with an empty socket, probably for bristles for a makeup brush. Photo by Fæ CC BY-SA 3.0
All in all, the discovery was a real treasure for archaeologists, and by extension, for Lawes. According to Smithsonian Magazine, in recognition of his discovery and willingness to contact authorities, the British government rewarded him with over £1.7 million, an amount which he shared with the farmer whose land was dug out in order to get the treasure. Funnily enough, apart from the treasure, Lawes also found his lost hammer — which now resides in the British Museum.

Related Posts

The Anunnaki (2025)

Get ready for a mind-bending adventure in The Return of the Anunnaki, a thrilling sci-fi epic that explores humanity’s ancient origins and its potential future. The Anunnaki,…

An underrated romance: Lady Chatterley’s Lover 2022

A story well ahead of its time, We follow the life of Lady Chatterley, a woman born to a life of wealth and privilege, who soon finds…

L’Amant (1992)

L’Amant (1992), also known as The Lover, is a French film directed by Jean-Jacques Annaud, adapted from the novel L’Amant by Marguerite Duras. The film is set…

Liebe und Verlangen (Love and Desire) (2019)

Liebe und Verlangen (Love and Desire) is a 2003 German television film that explores themes of love, desire, and societal expectations. The story centers around Karen, the…

Screen Gems reflects on The Dreamers (2003)

Michael Pitt is so memorable in this Bertolucci cinematic “delight”! The Dreamers is a romantic drama directed by the legendary Bernardo Bertolucci. The screenplay is by Gilbert…

Jamie and Jessie Are Not Together (2011)

Jamie and Jessie Are Not Together (2011) is a romantic dramedy about two best friends, Jamie and Jessie, whose close bond is complicated by unspoken feelings. Jamie…