Representative Norma Torres has sparked intense debate by labeling the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act a “direct attack” on women’s rights. During the 2026 midterm discussions, Torres argued that the bill’s strict requirement for documentary proof of citizenship such as a birth certificate or passport disproportionately burdens the estimated 69 million married women who have changed their names.

Because birth certificates often display maiden names that do not match current photo IDs, Torres contends these women would face redundant and costly bureaucratic hurdles to prove their identity and maintain their voter registration.

While supporters like Representative Chip Roy emphasize that the bill is essential for election integrity and preventing non-citizen voting, critics view it as a form of modern voter suppression.

They argue that requiring in-person verification and original marriage licenses creates barriers for low-income and minority voters. As the bill moves to the Senate, the clash over administrative feasibility versus security continues to polarize the electorate.