Mel Gibson Stuns Faithful Worldwide Claiming “Jesus’ Missing Words” Were Hidden in the Ethiopian Bible — Scholars Left Reeling by What Was Allegedly Revealed 

A storm is erupting across religious and academic circles after explosive claims emerged that ancient passages within the Ethiopian Bible contain words attributed to Jesus that were never included in widely accepted scripture. The revelation — passionately highlighted by Mel Gibson — is sending shockwaves far beyond the pulpit, igniting intense debate and raising uncomfortable questions about sacred history, the canon, and centuries-old ecclesiastical decisions.

The Claim: Jesus’ “Missing Words” Revealed

In a recent statement, Gibson, the director of The Passion of the Christ, shocked the world by pointing to hidden passages in the Ethiopian Bible, suggesting they contain teachings and words from Jesus that were omitted from the New Testament. These passages, preserved within one of the oldest and most distinct Christian traditions, are reportedly rich with detail, offering an expanded narrative of Jesus’ life and messages.

For centuries, the Ethiopian Bible has been venerated by the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, but its texts have remained outside the official canon of most other Christian denominations. According to Gibson, these newly highlighted passages show Jesus speaking with a tone, depth, and urgency that differs markedly from the well-known gospel accounts found in the King James Bible and other popular translations.

The Ethiopian Bible: A Rich and Overlooked Tradition

The Ethiopian Bible is a unique collection of scriptures, including many texts that were excluded from the canon recognized by Western Christianity. Among them are the Book of Enoch and the Book of Jubilees, which are often cited as holding significant historical and theological insights. However, it’s the newly revealed passages about Jesus that have theologians and scholars scrambling.

What makes these findings so shocking is the implication that critical elements of Jesus’ teachings may have been deliberately left out of the official canon. Experts in the field are now raising questions about whether centuries of ecclesiastical decisions — made by church councils and leaders behind closed doors — intentionally sidelined parts of the gospel narrative that were considered too controversial or radical.

A Deepening Debate: Suppressed Texts or Misunderstood History?

The revelation is sparking fierce debates among theologians, some of whom urge caution, suggesting that the texts could be a later addition or mistranslation, rather than authentic gospel writings. Others, however, concede that the material does raise profound questions about the selective process through which sacred history was curated. Were these teachings left out because they challenged mainstream beliefs? Did the early church have the authority to decide which parts of Jesus’ message were to be preserved — and which were to be ignored?

Scholars are now revisiting the historical and theological significance of the Ethiopian Bible, examining whether these passages represent the true “missing words” of Jesus — or if they merely offer a different interpretation of what was already known.

Theological Implications: What’s at Stake?

For believers, the question of authenticity is deeply personal. The possibility that some of Jesus’ teachings were excluded from the Bible opens a new can of worms about what Christians have been taught for centuries. Are these words a direct revelation from Jesus himself, or is this a theological development that came centuries after his time?

The debate extends beyond theological circles. Questions of power, control, and influence within the church have long lingered, with some suggesting that those in charge of defining the canon might have acted with political or doctrinal motives. If these “missing words” are truly the words of Christ, what do they reveal about the nature of his message, and how has it been filtered through the lens of history?

The Road Ahead: What’s Next for the Ethiopian Bible?

While the revelation of these ancient texts has caught the world’s attention, it remains to be seen how the wider Christian community will respond. Some are calling for a new wave of scholarship to reassess the canonical boundaries of scripture, while others are urging the faithful to remain cautious, reminding them that context and history must be considered before rushing to embrace new interpretations.

As this controversy unfolds, one thing is clear: the revelations of the Ethiopian Bible are unlikely to be a passing curiosity. Whether it reshapes the way Christians view the gospel or becomes a subject of intense theological division, the words Mel Gibson has brought to light are already challenging deeply held assumptions — and the conversation is only just beginning.