What was initially celebrated as a daring urban ascent has taken a dramatic turn following the emergence of newly analyzed video evidence. Multiple recordings—captured by spectators and building security systems—are now under forensic review after investigators identified discrepancies in the previously accepted timeline.

Officials confirm the case has shifted from a standard safety assessment to an active criminal probe. 🎥 Authorities are examining whether environmental conditions, third-party actions, or safety protocol failures may have contributed to the climber’s near-fatal fall.

Independent analysts reviewing the footage have noted irregular movement patterns and delayed reactions during the ascent. While such observations alone do not establish wrongdoing, they have prompted deeper scrutiny into whether warning indicators were present earlier than originally believed.

Law enforcement agencies stress that no conclusions have been reached and that investigators are working to reconstruct events frame by frame. ⚖️ The focus now centers on determining whether the incident resulted from personal risk, equipment failure, environmental factors, or potential negligence.

Public reaction has shifted sharply as questions mount about transparency and oversight. Social media discussions and public statements from safety advocates reflect growing concern about how high-risk urban climbs are monitored, authorized, and reviewed.

As the investigation unfolds, officials emphasize that verified evidence—not speculation—will guide findings.