Former President Donald Trump recently advocated for imposing term limits on members of Congress, suggesting that representatives should serve no more than 6 years in the House and 12 years in the Senate. If enacted, this proposal would result in the removal of approximately 73% of current members of Congress, as many have served for decades.

Trump’s plan aims to address what he perceives as stagnation and corruption within the U.S. government. By limiting the amount of time legislators can serve, Trump argues that new ideas and fresh leadership would have a better chance of entering the political system, potentially making the government more responsive to the needs of the people.

Proponents of term limits often cite the revolving door of career politicians who, they argue, prioritize re-election over representing their constituents. They believe that term limits would curb the influence of lobbyists and special interests, ensuring that lawmakers are not entrenched in power for too long.

Opponents of the proposal, however, argue that term limits could lead to a loss of experienced lawmakers, leaving Congress with less institutional knowledge and expertise. Some believe that the real solution lies in increasing voter engagement and holding incumbents accountable through elections, rather than limiting their time in office.

The debate continues to draw mixed reactions. While some view it as a necessary step toward political reform, others fear it could weaken the legislative process. Trump’s call for term limits has added a fresh layer to the ongoing conversation about the state of American politics and its future direction.